Hannah Norman, Author at Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News produces in-depth journalism on health issues and is a core operating program of KFF. Mon, 20 Apr 2026 18:09:24 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5 /wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=32 Hannah Norman, Author at Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News 32 32 161476233 Watch: As AI Makes More Health Coverage Decisions, the Risks to Patients Grow /courts/watch-ai-artificial-intelligence-prior-authorization-insurance-coverage-decisions/ Fri, 10 Apr 2026 09:00:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2181021

This year, executives from nearly every major health insurance company made the same declaration in calls with Wall Street analysts: Using artificial intelligence to make coverage decisions would help save them money.

Even the Trump administration is testing AI’s usefulness in managing the prior authorization process for the Medicare program, as well as seeking to override AI regulation by states.

But class action lawsuits have accused insurers of using AI to wrongfully withhold treatment. And outlines the risks of training AI on a current system rife with wrongful denials.

“There is a world in which using AI could make that worse, or at least replicate a bad human system, because the data that it would be training on is from that bad human system,” said Michelle Mello, a co-author of the study.

Although, Mello said, the research team found “real positives alongside the risks.”

In this video produced by Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News’ Hannah Norman, Darius Tahir, a correspondent covering health technology, explains.

You can read Tahir’s recent coverage of AI’s use by health insurers below:

Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

This <a target="_blank" href="/courts/watch-ai-artificial-intelligence-prior-authorization-insurance-coverage-decisions/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

<img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=2181021&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
2181021
RFK Jr. Made Promises in Order To Become Health Secretary. He’s Broken Many of Them. /health-industry/rfk-jr-robert-kennedy-vaccines-broken-promises-senators-cassidy/ Fri, 13 Feb 2026 10:00:00 +0000

One year after taking charge of the nation’s health department, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. hasn’t held true to many of he made while appealing to U.S. senators concerned about the longtime anti-vaccine activist’s plans for the nation’s care.

Kennedy squeaked through a narrow Senate vote to be confirmed as head of the Department of Health and Human Services, only after making a number of public and private guarantees about how he would handle vaccine funding and recommendations as secretary.

Here’s a look at some of the promises Kennedy made during his confirmation process.

The Childhood Vaccine Schedule

In two hearings in January 2025, Kennedy repeatedly assured senators that he supported childhood vaccines, noting that all his children were vaccinated.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) about the money he’s made in the private sector from lawsuits against vaccine makers and accused him of planning to profit from potential future policies making it easier to sue.

“Kennedy can kill off access to vaccines and make millions of dollars while he does it,” Warren said during the Senate Finance Committee hearing. “Kids might die, but Robert Kennedy can keep cashing in.”

Warren’s statement prompted an assurance by Kennedy.

“Senator, I support vaccines,” he said. “I support the childhood schedule. I will do that.”

Days later, Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, declared Kennedy had pledged to maintain existing vaccine recommendations if confirmed. Cassidy, a physician specializing in liver diseases and a vocal supporter of vaccination, had questioned Kennedy sharply in a hearing about his views on shots.

“If confirmed, he will maintain the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ recommendations without changes,” Cassidy said during a speech on the Senate floor explaining his vote for Kennedy.

A few months after he was confirmed, Kennedy fired all the incumbent members of the vaccine advisory panel, known as ACIP, and appointed new members, including several who, like him, oppose some vaccines. The panel’s recommendations soon changed drastically.

Last month, the CDC removed its universal recommendations for children to receive seven immunizations, those protecting against respiratory syncytial virus, meningococcal disease, flu, covid, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and rotavirus. The move followed a memorandum from the White House calling on the CDC to cull the schedule.

Now, those vaccines, which researchers estimate have prevented thousands of deaths and millions of illnesses, are recommended by the CDC only for children at high-risk of serious illness or after consultation between doctors and parents.

In response to questions about Kennedy’s actions on vaccines over the past year, HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said the secretary “continues to follow through on his commitments” to Cassidy.

“As part of those commitments, HHS accepted Chairman Cassidy’s numerous recommendations for key roles at the agency, retained particular language on the CDC website, and adopted ACIP recommendations,” Nixon added. “Secretary Kennedy talks to the chairman at a regular clip.”

Cassidy and his office have repeatedly rebuffed questions about whether Kennedy, since becoming secretary, has broken the commitments he made to the senator.

Vaccine Funding Axed

Weeks after Kennedy took over the federal health department, the CDC pulled back $11 billion in covid-era grants that local health departments were using to fund vaccination programs, among other initiatives.

That happened after Kennedy pledged during his confirmation hearings not to undermine vaccine funding.

Kennedy replied “Yes” when Cassidy asked him directly: “Do you commit that you will not work to impound, divert, or otherwise reduce any funding appropriated by Congress for the purpose of vaccination programs?”

A federal judge later ordered HHS to distribute the money.

The National Institutes of Health, part of HHS, also yanked dozens of research grants supporting studies of vaccine hesitancy last year. Kennedy, meanwhile, ordered the cancellation of a half-billion dollars’ worth of mRNA vaccine research in August.

A Discredited Theory About Autism

Cassidy said in his floor speech that he received a guarantee from Kennedy that the CDC’s website would not remove statements explaining that vaccines do not cause autism.

Technically, Kennedy kept his promise not to remove the statements. The website still says that vaccines do not cause autism.

But late last year, new statements sprung up on the same webpage, baselessly casting doubt on vaccine safety. “The claim ‘vaccines do not cause autism’ is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism,” the now misleadingly reads.

The webpage also states that the public has largely ignored studies showing vaccines do cause autism.

That is false. Over decades of research, scientific studies have repeatedly concluded that there is no link between vaccines and autism.

A controversial 1998 study that captured global attention did link the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine to autism. It was retracted for being fraudulent — though not until a decade after it was published, during which there were sharp declines in U.S. vaccination rates.

Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

This <a target="_blank" href="/health-industry/rfk-jr-robert-kennedy-vaccines-broken-promises-senators-cassidy/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

<img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=2153482&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
2153482
Watch: Is MAHA the New MAGA? /health-care-costs/watch-video-make-america-healthy-again-maha-maga-rfk-explainer/ Mon, 09 Feb 2026 10:00:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2152344

Republicans have hitched themselves to the “Make America Healthy Again” campaign, banking on its popularity to give them an electoral bounce. But the strategy carries risks.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime anti-vaccine activist who rails against Big Pharma and ultraprocessed food, is the leader of the movement. And Americans’ .

Plus, polls show about reducing health care costs than MAHA priorities such as ending vaccine mandates and promoting raw milk.

Enhanced Affordable Care Act subsidies expired at the end of 2025, fueling a nationwide affordability debate. Roughly 24 million people buy coverage on the Affordable Care Act marketplaces, and many are now facing premium payments more than double what they faced last year.

After taking a political back seat in recent years, health care may dominate the 2026 election races.

Credits

Bram Sable-Smith Host
Hannah Norman Video producer
Stephanie Armour Reporter
Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

This <a target="_blank" href="/health-care-costs/watch-video-make-america-healthy-again-maha-maga-rfk-explainer/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

<img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=2152344&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
2152344
Oregon Hospital Races To Build a Tsunami Shelter as FEMA Fights To Cut Its Funding /health-industry/tsunami-shelter-oregon-hospital-fema-funding-cut-lawsuit/ Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:00:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2130169 ASTORIA, Ore. — Residents of this small coastal city in the Pacific Northwest know what to do when there’s a tsunami warning: Flee to higher ground.

For those in or near Columbia Memorial, the city’s only hospital, there will soon be a different plan: Shelter in place. The hospital is building a new facility next door with an on-site tsunami shelter — an elevated refuge atop columns deeply anchored in the ground, where nearly 2,000 people can safely wait out a flood.

Oregon needs more shelters like the one that Columbia Memorial is building, emergency managers say. Hospitals in the region are likely to incur serious damage, if not ruin, and could take more than three years to fully recover in the event of a major earthquake and tsunami, according to .

Columbia Memorial’s current facility is a single-story building, a half-century ago, that would likely collapse and sink into the ground or be swallowed by a landslide after a major earthquake or a tsunami, said Erik Thorsen, the hospital’s chief executive.

“It is just not built to survive either one of those natural disaster events,” Thorsen said.

At least 10 other hospitals along the Oregon coast are in danger as well. So Columbia Memorial leaders proposed building a hospital capable of withstanding an earthquake and landslide, with a tsunami shelter, instead of relocating the facility to higher ground. Residents and state officials supported the plans, and the federal government awarded a $14 million grant from the Federal Emergency Management Agency to help pay for the tsunami shelter.

The project broke ground in October 2024. Within six months, the Trump administration had , known as Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities, or BRIC, calling it “yet another example of a wasteful and ineffective FEMA program … more concerned with political agendas than helping Americans affected by natural disasters.”

Molly Wing, director of the expansion project, said losing the BRIC grant felt like “a punch to the gut.”

“We really didn’t see that coming,” she said.

Molly Wing, director of the Columbia Memorial Hospital expansion project, was crestfallen to learn FEMA had canceled a $14 million grant for a tsunami shelter. “It was pretty devastating,” she says. (Hannah Norman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

This summer, Oregon and 19 other states sued to restore the FEMA grants. On Dec. 11, a that the Trump administration had unlawfully ended the program without congressional approval.

The administration did not immediately indicate it would appeal the decision, but Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said by email: “DHS has not terminated BRIC. Any suggestion to the contrary is a lie. The Biden Administration abandoned true mitigation and used BRIC as a green new deal slush fund. It’s unfortunate that an activist judge either didn’t understand that or didn’t care.” FEMA is a subdivision of DHS.

Columbia Memorial was one of the few hospitals slated to receive grants from the BRIC program, which had announced more than $4.5 billion for nearly 2,000 building projects since 2022.

Hospital leaders have decided to keep building — with uncertain funding — because they say waiting is too dangerous. With the Trump administration reversing course on BRIC, fewer communities will receive help from FEMA to reduce their disaster risk, even places where catastrophes are likely.

More than three centuries have passed since a major earthquake caused the Pacific Northwest’s coastline to drop several feet and unleashed a tsunami that crashed onto the land in January 1700, according to scientists who study the evolution of the Oregon coast.

The greatest danger is an underwater fault line known as the , which lies 70 to 100 miles off the coast, from Northern California to British Columbia.

The Cascadia zone can produce a megathrust earthquake, with a magnitude of 9 or higher — the type capable of triggering a catastrophic tsunami — , according to the U.S. Geological Survey. Scientists predict a 10% to 15% chance of such an earthquake along the fault zone in the next 50 years.

“We can’t wait any longer,” Thorsen said. “The risk is high.”

Design plans for Columbia Memorial Hospital show a five-level building with a rooftop refuge designed to withstand an earthquake and keep people safe from a tsunami. Most patient services will be provided on the second and third levels, above the projected tsunami flood level.

Building for the Future

The BRIC program started in 2020, during the first Trump administration, to provide communities and institutions with funding and technical assistance to fortify their structures against natural disasters.

Joel Scata, a senior attorney with the environmental advocacy group Natural Resources Defense Council, said the program helped communities better prepare so they could reduce the cost of rebuilding after a flood, tornado, wildfire, or extreme weather event.

To qualify for a grant, a hospital had to show that the project’s benefits were greater than the future danger and cost. In some cases, that benefit might not be readily apparent.

“It prevents bad disasters from happening, and so you don’t necessarily see it in action,” Scata said.

Scata noted that the Trump administration has also stopped awarding grants through FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, which predates BRIC.

“There really is no money going out the door from the federal government to help communities reduce their disaster risk,” he said.

A recent Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News investigation using proprietary data from Fathom, a global leader in flood modeling, found that at least 170 U.S. hospitals are at risk of significant and potentially dangerous flooding from more intense and frequent storms. That count did not include Columbia Memorial, as Fathom’s data did not account for tsunamis. It models flooding from rivers, sea level rise, and extreme rainfall.

In recent days, an atmospheric river — a narrow storm band carrying significant amounts of moisture — dumped more than 15 inches of rain on parts of Oregon and Washington, causing catastrophic flooding along rivers and the coast. In the Washington town of Sedro-Woolley, which sits along the Skagit River, the PeaceHealth evacuated nonemergency patients.

High winds battered Astoria, leaving the city with some minor landslides, according to news reports. But flooding on the road to the nearby beach town of Seaside made the drive nearly impassable.

The Trump administration is leaning on states to take greater responsibility for recovering from natural disasters, Scata said, but most states are not financially prepared to do so.

“The disasters are just going to keep on piling up,” he said, “and the federal government’s going to have to keep stepping in.”

Construction crews broke ground on a new building for Columbia Memorial Hospital in fall 2024. The new facility is budgeted at $300 million and will include a rooftop refuge to withstand a tsunami, accommodating up to 1,900 people. (Hannah Norman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

A Hospital at Risk

Columbia Memorial is blocks from the southern shore of the Columbia River, near the Washington border, where the include earthquakes, tsunamis, landslides, and floods. A critical access hospital with 25 beds, it opened in 1977 — before state building codes addressed tsunami protections.

Thorsen said the new facility and shelter would be a “model design” for other hospitals. Design plans show a five-level hospital built atop a foundation anchored to the bedrock and surrounded by concrete columns to shield it from tsunami debris.

The shelter will be on the roof of the second floor, above the projected maximum tsunami inundation. It will be accessible via an outdoor staircase and interior staircases and elevators, with enough room for up to 1,900 people, plus food, water, tents, and other supplies to sustain them for five days.

A line drawing of a building and surround parking lots has colors highlighting the "Tsunami Evacuation Stair", additional stairs inside the building, and two areas marked "Safe Refuge Area."
The hospital expansion project is expected to be completed by the end of 2027 and will provide Astoria with the city’s only elevated tsunami shelter. (Columbia Memorial Hospital)
A rendering of a building with an outdoor staircase. On the ground floor, a roof extends from the building over outdoor chairs and tables.
Plans call for an outdoor staircase leading to a rooftop tsunami refuge capable of holding up to 1,900 people, and enough food, water, tents, and other supplies to sustain them for five days. (Columbia Memorial Hospital)

With most patient care provided on the second and third levels, generators on the fourth level, and utility lines underground, the hospital is expected to remain operational after a natural disaster.

Thorsen said an earthquake and tsunami threaten not only vast flooding , in which the ground loosens and causes structures above it to collapse. Deep foundations, thick slabs, and other structural supports are expected to protect the new hospital and tsunami structure against such failure.

Through the years, hospital administrators and civic leaders in Astoria have sought other locations for Columbia Memorial. But relocation wasn’t economical. Columbia Memorial committed to invest in a new hospital and tsunami shelter to protect not only patients and staff but also nearby residents.

“Your community should count on your hospital to be a safe haven in a natural disaster,” Thorsen said.

Columbia Memorial, a 25-bed critical access hospital, opened in Astoria in 1977. (Hannah Norman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

Fighting To Restore Funds

The estimated construction budget for Columbia Memorial’s expansion is $300 million, mostly financed through new debt from the hospital. The tsunami shelter is budgeted at about $20 million, for which FEMA’s BRIC program , with a $6 million matching grant from the state, which has maintained its support.

The shelter and the building’s structural protections — featuring reinforced steel, deeper foundations, and thicker slabs — are integral to the design and cannot be removed without compromising the rest of the structure, said Michelle Checkis, the project architect.

“We can’t pull the TVERS [tsunami vertical evacuation refuge structure] out without pulling the hospital back apart again,” she said. “It’s kind of like, if I was going to stack it up with Legos, I would have to take all those Legos apart and stack it up completely differently.”

Michelle Checkis, of ZGF Architects, is the project architect for Columbia Memorial Hospital’s planned expansion. She says the new hospital building was designed to withstand the region’s natural disasters, including earthquakes, tsunamis, and landslides. “Every piece of steel in the building is sized to take that extra load,” she says. “The foundations are deeper to be able to do that. The slabs are thicker.” (Hannah Norman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

Columbia Memorial has sought help from Oregon’s congressional delegation. In to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and former FEMA acting administrator David Richardson, the lawmakers demanded that the agencies restore the hospital’s grant.

The hospital’s leadership is seeking other grants and philanthropic donations to make up for the loss. As a last resort, Thorsen said, the board will consider removing “nonessential features” from the building, though he added that there is little fat to trim from the project.

The in July alleged that FEMA lacks the authority to cancel the BRIC program or redirect its funding for other purposes.

The states argued that canceling the program and undermined projects underway.

In their response to the lawsuit, the Trump administration said repeatedly that the defendants “deny that the BRIC program has been terminated.”

The lawsuit cites examples of projects at risk in each state due to FEMA’s termination of the grants. Oregon’s first example is Columbia Memorial’s tsunami shelter. “Neither the County nor the State can afford to resume the project without federal funding,” the lawsuit states.

In response to questions about the impact of canceling the grant on Astoria and the surrounding community, DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said BRIC had “deviated from its statutory intent.”

“BRIC was more focused on climate change initiatives like bicycle lanes, shaded bus stops, and planting trees, rather than disaster relief or mitigation,” McLaughlin said. DHS and FEMA provided no further comment about BRIC or the Astoria hospital.

A statue of a woman holding a large fish is placed next to a sign reading "Cannery" at Astoria's waterfront. A bridge over the river is behind.
Fish canning was once the primary industry in Astoria, but the last cannery closed in the 1980s. (Hannah Norman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)
A cargo ship moves along the Columbia river. Wooden posts stick out of the water in the foreground, closer to shore.
Astoria sits on a peninsula that juts into the Columbia River near the Pacific Ocean. (Hannah Norman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

Preparing for a Tsunami Disaster

Located near the end of the Lewis & Clark National Historic Trail, Astoria sits on a peninsula that juts into the Columbia River near the Pacific Ocean.

Much of the city is not in the tsunami inundation area. But Astoria’s downtown commercial district — where gift shops, hotels, and seafood restaurants line the streets — is nearly all an evacuation zone.

Two hospitals — Ocean Beach Health in nearby Washington, and Providence Seaside Hospital in Oregon — are about 20 miles from Columbia Memorial. Both are 25-bed hospitals, and neither is designed to withstand a tsunami.

Ocean Beach Health regularly conducts drills for mass-casualty and natural disasters, said Brenda Sharkey, its chief nursing officer.

“We focus our planning and investments on areas where we can make a real difference for our community before, during, and after an event — such as maintaining continuity of care, ensuring rapid triage, and coordinating with regional emergency partners,” Sharkey said in an email.

In Astoria, waterfront houses on stilts surround a pond connected to the Columbia River. The neighborhood is on the site of a former plywood mill. (Hannah Norman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

Gary Walker, a spokesperson for Providence Seaside, said in a statement that the hospital has a “comprehensive emergency plan for earthquakes and tsunamis, including alternative sites and mobile resources.”

Walker added that Providence Seaside has hired “a team of consultants and experts to conduct a conceptual resilience study” that would evaluate the hospital’s vulnerabilities and recommend ways to address them.

Oregon’s emergency managers advise residents and visitors in coastal communities to immediately seek higher ground after a major earthquake — and not to rely on tsunami sirens, social media, or most technology.

“There may not even be cellphone towers operating after an event like this,” said Jonathan Allan, a coastal geomorphologist with the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries. “The earthquake shaking, its intensity, and particularly the length of time in which the shaking persists, is the warning message.”

The stronger the earthquake and the longer the shaking, he said, the more likely a tsunami will head to shore.

A tsunami triggered by a Cascadia zone earthquake could strike land in , according to state estimates.

Many of Oregon’s seaside communities are near high-enough ground to seek safety from a tsunami in a relatively short time, Allan said. But he estimated that, to save lives, Oregon would need about a dozen vertical tsunami evacuation shelters along the coast, including in seaside towns that attract tourists and where the nearest high ground is a mile or more away.

Willis Van Dusen’s family has lived in Astoria since the mid-19th century. A former mayor of Astoria, Van Dusen stressed that tsunamis are not a hypothetical danger. He recalled seeing one in Seaside in 1964. The wave was only about 18 inches high, he said, but it flooded a road and destroyed a bridge and some homes. The memory has stayed with him.

“It’s not like … ‘Oh, that’ll never happen,’” he said. “We have to be prepared for it.”

A man with white hair and dark glasses speaks to someone just off-camera.
Willis Van Dusen, a former mayor of Astoria, says that tsunamis are not a hypothetical danger. “We have to be prepared for it,” he says. (Hannah Norman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)
A "Tsunami Evacuation Map" for the Basin & Riverwalk is shown on a metal post. A railroad crossing sign, tree, and streetlight are out of focus behind it.
People in Astoria are advised to seek higher ground when a tsunami warning is issued. Evacuation maps posted on city streets show them where to flee for safety. (Hannah Norman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News correspondent Brett Kelman contributed to this report.

Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

This <a target="_blank" href="/health-industry/tsunami-shelter-oregon-hospital-fema-funding-cut-lawsuit/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

<img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=2130169&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
2130169
At Least 170 US Hospitals Face Major Flood Risk. Experts Say Trump Is Making It Worse. /health-industry/hospital-flooding-risk-investigation-trump-policies-fema/ Wed, 01 Oct 2025 10:01:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2093496
Flood risk data provided by Fathom shows estimated flooding at four American hospitals. CAMC Memorial and Sherman Oaks Hospital officials said in statements that they were aware of their flood risk and had prepared by obtaining deployable flood barriers and elevating their infrastructure. Representatives for Peninsula Hospital and Kadlec Regional Medical Center declined to answer questions about flooding. (Hannah Norman and Brett Kelman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

LOUISVILLE, Tenn. — When a big storm hits, Peninsula Hospital could be underwater.

At this decades-old psychiatric hospital on the edge of the Tennessee River, an intense storm could submerge the building in 11 feet of water, cutting off all roads around the facility, according to a sophisticated computer simulation of flood risk.

Aurora, a young woman who was committed to Peninsula as a teenager, said the hospital sits so close to the river that it felt like a moat keeping her and dozens of other patients inside. Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News agreed not to publish her full name because she shared private medical history.

“My first feeling is doom,” Aurora said as she watched the simulation of the river rising around the hospital. “These are probably some of the most vulnerable people.”

Covenant Health, which runs Peninsula Hospital, said in a statement it has a “proactive and thorough approach to emergency planning” but declined to provide details or answer questions.

Peninsula is one of about 170 American hospitals, totaling nearly 30,000 patient beds from coast to coast, that face the greatest risk of significant or dangerous flooding, according to a months-long Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News investigation based on data provided by Fathom, a company considered a leader in flood simulation. At many of these hospitals, flooding from heavy storms has the potential to jeopardize patient care, block access to emergency rooms, and force evacuations. Sometimes there is no other hospital nearby.

A woman wearing a yellow t-shirt and jeans stands with her back to the camera and looks an a building at the other end of a long driveway. Her dark hair is in two braids and her hands are clasped behind her back.
Aurora, a former Peninsula Hospital patient, looks at the Tennessee psychiatric hospital where she was committed as a teenager. Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News agreed not to publish her full name because she shared private medical history. (Brett Kelman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

Much of this risk to hospitals is not captured by flood maps issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which have served as the nation’s de facto tool for flood estimation for half a century, despite being incomplete and sometimes decades out of date. As FEMA’s maps have become divorced from the reality of a changing climate, private companies like Fathom have filled the gap with simulations of future floods. But many of their predictions are behind a paywall, leaving the public mostly reliant on free, significantly limited government maps.

“This is highly concerning,” said Caleb Dresser, who studies climate change and is both an emergency room doctor and a Harvard University assistant professor. “If you don’t have the information to know you’re at risk, then how can you triage that problem?”

The deadliest hospital flooding in modern American history occurred 20 years ago during Hurricane Katrina, when the bodies of 45 people were recovered from New Orleans’ Memorial Medical Center, including some patients whom investigators . More flooding deaths were narrowly avoided one year ago when helicopters rescued dozens of people as Hurricane Helene engulfed Unicoi County Hospital in Erwin, Tennessee.

Rebecca Harrison, a paramedic, called her children from the Unicoi roof to say goodbye.

“I was scared to death, thinking, ‘This is it,’” Harrison told CBS News, which interviewed Unicoi survivors as part of Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News’ investigation. “Alarms were going off. People were screaming. It was chaos.”

A woman with her blonde hair up in ponytail organizes items in a plastic container while sitting inside an ambulance. Her white polo shirt reads "R. Harrison, Chief of EMS" and has an emblem on the front. The left sleeve reads "Unicoi County EMS".
Rebecca Harrison, a paramedic, was rescued from the rooftop of Unicoi County Hospital in Erwin, Tennessee, during severe flooding caused by Hurricane Helene in September 2024. “I was never so happy to see helicopters,” she says. (Chance Horner/CBS News)

The investigation — among the first to analyze nationwide hospital flood risk in an era of warming climate and worsening storms — comes as the administration of President Donald Trump has slashed and and also dismantled FEMA programs designed to protect hospitals and other important buildings from floods.

When asked to comment, FEMA said flooding is a common, costly, and “under appreciated” disaster but made no statement specific to hospitals. Spokesperson Daniel Llargués defended the administration’s changes to FEMA by reissuing an August statement that dismissed criticism as coming from “bureaucrats who presided over decades of inefficiency.”

Alice Hill, an Obama administration climate risk expert, said the Trump administration’s dismissal of climate change and worsening floods would waste billions of dollars and endanger lives.

In 2015, Hill led the creation of the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard, which required that hospitals and other essential structures be elevated or incorporate extra flood protections to qualify for federal funding.

FEMA  the standard in March.

“People will die as a result of some of the choices being made today,” Hill said. “We will be less prepared than we are now. And we already were, in my estimation, poorly prepared.”

‘Flood Risk Is Everywhere’

The Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News investigation identified more than 170 hospitals facing a flood risk by comparing the locations of more than 7,000 facilities to , a United Kingdom company that simulates flooding in spaces as small as 10 meters using laser-precision elevation measurements from the .

Hospitals were determined to have a significant risk if Fathom’s 100-year flood data predicted that a foot or more of water could reach a considerable portion of their buildings, excluding parking garages, or cut off road access to the hospital. A 100-year flood is an intense weather event that has roughly a 1% chance of occurring in any given year but can happen more often.

The investigation found heightened flood risks at large trauma centers, small rural hospitals, children’s hospitals, and long-term care facilities that serve older and disabled patients. At least 21 are critical access hospitals, with the next-closest hospital 25 miles away, on average.

Flooding threatens dozens of hospitals in coastal areas, including in Florida, Louisiana, Texas, and New York. Farther inland, flooding of rivers or creeks could envelop other hospitals, particularly in Appalachia and the Midwest. Even in the sun-soaked cities and arid expanses of the American West, storms have the potential to surround some hospitals with several feet of pooling water, according to Fathom’s data.

These findings are likely an undercount of hospitals at risk because the investigation overlooked pockets of potential flooding at some hospitals. It excluded facilities like stand-alone ERs, outpatient clinics, and nursing homes.

“The reality is that flood risk is everywhere. It is the most pervasive of perils,” said Oliver Wing, the chief scientific officer at Fathom, who reviewed the findings. “Just because you’ve never experienced an extreme doesn’t mean you never will.”

Dresser, the ER doctor, said even a small amount of flooding can shut down an unprepared hospital, often by interrupting its power supply, which is needed for life-sustaining equipment like ventilators and heart monitors. He said the most vulnerable hospitals would likely be in rural areas.

“A lot of rural hospitals are now closing their pediatric units, closing their psychiatry units,” Dresser said. “In a financially stressed situation, it can be hard to prioritize long-term threats, even if they are, for some institutions, potentially existential.”

Urban hospitals can face dangerous flooding, too. Fathom’s data predicts 5 to 15 feet of water around neighboring hospitals — Kadlec Regional Medical Center and Lourdes Behavioral Health — that straddle a tiny creek in Richland, Washington.

By Fathom’s estimate, a 100-year flood could cause the nearby Columbia River to spill over a levee that protects Richland, then loosely follow the creek to the hospitals. Some of the deepest flooding is estimated around Lourdes, which was built on land the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers set aside in 1961 as a “ponding and drainage easement.”

At the time, this land was supposed to be capable of storing enough water to fill at least 40 Olympic-size swimming pools, according to obtained through the Freedom of Information Act. A mental health facility has occupied this spot since the 1970s.

(Hannah Norman and Brett Kelman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

Both Kadlec and Lourdes said in statements that they have disaster plans but did not answer questions about flooding. Tina Baumgardner, a Lourdes spokesperson, said government flood maps show the hospital is not in a 100-year flood plain.

This is not uncommon. Of the more than 170 hospitals with significant flood risk identified by Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News, one-third are located in areas that FEMA has not designated as flood hazard zones.

Sometimes the difference is stark. For example, at Ochsner Choctaw General in Alabama — the only hospital for 30 miles in any direction — FEMA maps suggest a 100-year flood would overflow a nearby creek but spare the hospital. Fathom’s data predicts the same event would flood most of the hospital with 1 to 2 feet of water, including the ER and the helicopter pad.

Ochsner Health did not answer questions about flooding preparations at Choctaw General.

FEMA flood maps were launched in the ’60s as part of the National Flood Insurance Program to determine where insurance is required and building codes should include flood-proofing. According to a FEMA statement, the maps show only a “snapshot in time” and are not intended to predict where flooding will or won’t happen.

FEMA spokesperson Geoff Harbaugh said the agency intends to modernize its maps through the Future of Flood Risk Data initiative, which will enable the agency to “better project flood risk” and give Americans “the information they need to protect their lives and property.”

The program was launched by the first Trump administration in 2019 but has since received sparse public updates. Harbaugh declined to provide a detailed update or timeline for the program.

Chad Berginnis, executive director of the Association of State Floodplain Managers, said it is unknown whether FEMA is still trying to upgrade its maps under Trump, as the agency has cut off communications with outside flooding experts.

“There has been not a single bit of loosening of what I’m calling the FEMA cone of silence,” Berginnis said. “I’ve never seen anything like it.”

Floods are expected to worsen as a warming climate fuels stronger storms, drenching areas that are already flood-prone and bringing a new level of flooding to areas once considered lower risk.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has said that 2024 was the warmest year on record — more than 2 degrees Fahrenheit higher than the 20th-century average. Scientists across the globe that each degree of global warming correlates to a 4% increase in the intensity of extreme rainfall.

“Warmer air can hold more moisture, so this leads us to experience heavier downpours,” said Kelly Van Baalen, a sea level rise expert at the nonprofit . “A 100-year flood today could be a 10-year flood tomorrow.”

Intensifying storms raise concerns about Peninsula Hospital, which has operated for decades mere feet from the Tennessee River but has no known history of flooding.

(Hannah Norman and Brett Kelman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

Peninsula spokesperson Josh Cox said the river is overseen by the Tennessee Valley Authority, which uses dams to manage water levels and generate electricity. Estimates provided by the TVA suggest the dams could keep Peninsula dry even in a 500-year flood.

Fathom, however, said its flood simulation accounts for the dams and stressed that a large enough storm could drop more rain than even the TVA could control. These predictions are echoed by another flood modeling firm, , which also says an intense storm could cause more than 10 feet of flooding in the area around Peninsula.

“It’s a hospital right on the banks of a major American river,” said Wing, the Fathom scientist. “It just isn’t conceivable that such a location is risk-free.”

Jack Goodwin, 75, a retired TVA employee who has lived next to Peninsula for three decades, said he was confident the dams could protect the area. But after reviewing Fathom’s predictions, Goodwin began to research flood insurance.

“Water can rise quickly and suddenly, and the destruction is tremendous,” he said. “Just because we’ve never seen it here doesn’t mean we won’t see it.”

A low building is shown surrounded by trees and with a river behind it.
Peninsula Hospital, a psychiatric hospital southwest of Knoxville on the edge of the Tennessee River, could be surrounded by 11 feet of water in an intense storm, according to flood simulations by Fathom. Covenant Health, which owns Peninsula, said it has planned for emergencies but declined to discuss the possibility of flooding at the hospital. (Brett Kelman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)
In a photo taken from a craft on a river, a single-story building building sits near the water. There is a fenced-in playground, a shed, a gazebo, and a small parking lot surrounding the building. Trees can be seen in the distance behind the building and its grounds.
Peninsula Hospital is so close to the Tennessee River that it felt like a moat that kept patients inside, says Aurora, a young woman who was committed to the hospital as a teenager. Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News agreed not to publish her full name because she shared private medical history. Covenant Health, which runs Peninsula, said it has planned for emergencies but declined to discuss flood risk. (Brett Kelman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

‘All the Elements of a Real Disaster’

One year ago, as Hurricane Helene carved a deadly path across Southern Appalachia, Angel Mitchell was visiting her ailing mother at Unicoi County Hospital in the tiny town of Erwin, Tennessee.

Swollen by Helene, the nearby Nolichucky River spilled over its banks and around the hospital, which was built in a flood plain. Staff tried to bar the doors, Mitchell said, but the water got in, trapping her and others inside. The lights went out. People fled to the roof, where the roar of rushing water nearly drowned out the approach of rescue helicopters, Mitchell said.

Ultimately, 70 people from the hospital, including Mitchell and her mother, were airlifted to safety on Sept. 27, 2024. The hospital remains closed, and the company that owns it, Ballad Health, has said its .

“Why allow something — especially a hospital — to be built in an area like that?” Mitchell told CBS News. “People have to rely on these areas to get medical help, and they’re dangerous.”

A woman with wavy brown hair and wearing a gray shirt looks off-camera to her left.
Angel Mitchell and her mother were rescued from catastrophic flooding at Unicoi County Hospital in Erwin, Tennessee, during Hurricane Helene in September 2024. “Seeing any of those patients get out of that water, it was a miracle,” Mitchell says. “God was with us.” (Chance Horner/CBS News)
A photo of brown flood waters swallowing up ambulances.
Hospital staffers and emergency responders tried to evacuate patients first by ambulance and then by boat when the Nolichucky River overwhelmed Unicoi County Hospital during Hurricane Helene. Eventually, everyone was evacuated by helicopter. (Ballad Health)

Beyond Unicoi, Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News identified 39 inland hospitals — including 16 in Appalachia — that Fathom predicts could flood when nearby rivers, creeks, or drainage canals overspill their banks, even in storms far less intense than Helene.

For example, in the Cumberland Mountains of southwestern Virginia, a 100-year flood is projected to cause Slate Creek to engulf Buchanan General Hospital in more than 5 feet of water.

Near the Great Lakes in Erie, Pennsylvania, LECOM Medical Center and Behavioral Health Pavilion could become flooded by a small drainage creek that is less than 50 feet from the front door of the ER.

Neither Buchanan nor LECOM responded to questions about flooding or preparations.

And in West Virginia’s capital of Charleston, where about 50,000 people live at the junction of two rivers in a wide and flat valley, a single storm could potentially flood five of the city’s six hospitals at once, along with schools, churches, fire departments, and other facilities.

“I hate to say it,” said Behrang Bidadian, a flood plain manager at the , “but it has all the elements of a real disaster.”

(Hannah Norman and Brett Kelman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

At the largest hospital in Charleston, CAMC Memorial Hospital, Fathom predicts that the Kanawha River could bring as much as 5 feet of flooding to the ER. Across town, the Elk River could surround CAMC Women and Children’s Hospital, cutting off all exits.

And in the center of the city, where the overflowing rivers are predicted to merge, Thomas Orthopedic Hospital could be besieged by more than 10 feet of water on three sides.

WVU Medicine, which owns Thomas Orthopedic Hospital, did not respond to requests for comment.

CAMC spokesperson Dale Witte said the hospital system is aware of its flood risk and has prepared by elevating electrical infrastructure and acquiring flood-proofing equipment, like a deployable floodwall. CAMC also regularly revises and drills its disaster plans, Witte said, although he added that hospitals there have never been tested by a real flood.

Several buildings can be seen a short distance from a river, beyond a road and some houses. Steps lead down the riverbank to dock and boat.
The largest hospital in Charleston, West Virginia, CAMC Memorial, is located near the Kanawha River, which runs the length of the city. Fathom, a flood modeling company, predicts that extreme weather could cause the river to overspill its banks and bring as much as 5 feet of flooding to the hospital’s ER. (Daniel Chang/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)
Several buildings can be seen on the banks of a river on slightly higher ground.
CAMC Women and Children’s Hospital in Charleston, West Virginia, is located on the banks of the Elk River. Extreme weather could cause the river to swell beyond its banks and surround the hospital, closing off all exits, according to a simulation of flooding data from Fathom. CAMC spokesperson Dale Witte said the hospital system has prepared by elevating electrical infrastructure and acquiring pumps. (Daniel Chang/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)
Building surround a road looping around a greenspace with walkways and a sign reading "WVU Medicine".
Thomas Orthopedic Hospital is located near the juncture of the Elk and Kanawha rivers in Charleston, West Virginia. A severe rainstorm, the kind that is occurring more frequently due to a warming climate, could engulf the facility with more than 10 feet of water on three sides, according to data from Fathom. (Daniel Chang/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)
A hospital building is shown at a road intersection with a traffic light.
CAMC General Hospital in Charleston, West Virginia, is one of five large medical centers in the city that are vulnerable to a 100-year flood, according to a simulation from Fathom. A 100-year flood has roughly a 1% chance of happening in any given year but can occur more often. (Daniel Chang/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

    Shanen Wright, 48, a lifelong Charleston resident who lives near CAMC Memorial, said many in the city have little worry about flooding in the face of more immediate problems, like the opioid epidemic and the decline of manufacturing and mining.

    Tugboats and coal barges sail past his neighborhood as if they were cars on his street.

    “It’s not to say it’s not a possibility,” he said. “I’m sure the people in Asheville and the people in Texas, where the floods took so many lives, they probably didn’t see it coming either.”

    A man with sandy-gray hair and beard, wearing glasses, a navy blue t-shirt, khaki shorts, and sneakers stands on grass and looks at the camera. His hands are in his pockets. Behind him is a river, a boat on the river, and buildings on the opposite shore, including a golden dome in the distance.
    Shanen Wright has lived in Charleston, West Virginia, nearly five decades and says he has never seen the Kanawha River rise above its banks. Located at the junction of two rivers in a wide and flat valley, Charleston is at risk of a single storm potentially flooding the city’s five largest hospitals at once, according to flood data from the company Fathom. (Daniel Chang/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

    ‘The Water Is Coming’

    Despite wide scientific consensus that climate change fuels more dangerous weather, the Trump administration has that concerns about global warming are overblown. In a speech to the United Nations in September, Trump called climate change “the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world.”

    The Trump administration has made deep staff and funding cuts to FEMA, NOAA, and the National Weather Service. At FEMA, the cuts prompted 191 current and former employees to in August warning that the agency is being dismantled from within.

    Daniel Swain, a University of California climate scientist, said the administration’s rejection of climate change has left the nation less prepared for extreme weather, now and in the future.

    “It’s akin to enforcing malpractice scientifically,” Swain said. “Imagine making a medical decision where you are not allowed to look at 20% of the patient’s vital signs or test results.”

    The interior of a destroyed build where metal hangs from the ceiling and drywall, debris, and mud cover the floor.
    Unicoi County Hospital in Erwin, Tennessee, was destroyed by a flash flood during Hurricane Helene in late September 2024. During the worst of the flooding, murky, brown rapids surrounded the hospital building, with 12 feet of water on all sides. (Lauren Sausser/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

    Under Trump, FEMA has also taken actions critics say will leave the nation more vulnerable to flooding, specifically:

    • FEMA disbanded the Technical Mapping Advisory Council, which had to modernize its flood maps to estimate future risk and account for the impacts of climate change.
    • FEMA canceled its program, which provided grants to help communities and vital buildings, including hospitals, protect themselves from floods and other natural disasters.
    • And after stopping enforcement early this year, FEMA the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard, which was designed to harden buildings against future floods and save tax dollars in the long run.

    Berginnis, of the Association of State Floodplain Managers, said the administration’s unwillingness to prepare for climate change and worsening storms would result in a dangerous and costly cycle of flooding, rebuilding, and flooding again.

    “The president is saying we are closed for business when it comes to hazard mitigation,” Berginnis said. “It bugs me to no end that we have to have reminders — like people dying — to show us why it’s important to make these investments.”

    FEMA did not answer specific questions about these decisions. In the statement to Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News, spokesperson Llargués touted the administration’s response to flooding in Texas and New Mexico and said FEMA had provided billions of dollars to help people and communities recover and rebuild. He did not mention any FEMA funding for protecting against future floods.

    Few hospitals understand this threat more than the former Coney Island Hospital in New York City, which has suffered catastrophic flooding before and has prepared for it to come again.

    Superstorm Sandy in 2012 forced the hospital to evacuate hundreds of patients. When the water receded, fish and a sea turtle were found in the building.

    Eleven years later, the facility reopened as Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hospital, transformed by a FEMA-funded $923 million reconstruction project that added a 4-foot floodwall and elevated patient care areas and utility infrastructure above the first floor.

    It is now likely one of the most flood-proofed hospitals in the nation.

    But, so far, no storm has tested the facility.

    Svetlana Lipyanskaya, CEO of NYC Health+Hospitals/South Brooklyn Health, which includes the rebuilt hospital, said the question of flooding is “not an if but a when.”

    “I hope it doesn’t happen in my lifetime,” she said, “but frankly, I’d be surprised. The water is coming.”

    Methodology

    After Hurricane Helene made landfall a year ago, a raging river flooded a rural hospital in eastern Tennessee. Patients and employees were rescued from the rooftop. Floods have hit hospitals from New York to Nebraska to Texas in recent years. We wanted to determine how many other U.S. hospitals face similar peril. Ultimately, we found more than 170 hospitals at risk.

    For this analysis, we used data from , a United Kingdom-based company that specializes in flood-risk modeling across the globe. To assess the United States’ vulnerability, Fathom uses sophisticated computer simulations and detailed terrain data covering the country. It accounts for environmental factors such as climate change, soil conditions, and many rivers and creeks not mapped by other sources. Fathom’s modeling has been and , the World Bank, the Nature Conservancy, and government agencies in Florida, Texas, and elsewhere. The Iowa Flood Center has .

    Through a data use agreement, Fathom shared its U.S. mapping data that predicts areas with at least a 1% chance of flooding in any given year. Fathom’s data estimates the effects of of flooding: coastal, fluvial (from overflowing rivers, lakes, or streams), and pluvial (rainfall that the ground can’t absorb). The data also accounts for dams, reservoirs, and other structures that defend against floods.

    To identify at-risk hospitals, we used a publicly available Department of Homeland Security database containing the GPS coordinates of more than 7,000 short-term acute, critical access, rehab, and psychiatric hospitals — basically any hospital with inpatient services. (DHS under the Trump administration has discontinued public access to the database, so data for hospitals and other infrastructure is no longer widely available.)

    Using GPS coordinates as the centerpoint, we created a circle with a 150-yard radius around each hospital, which in most cases captured the building plus nearby grounds and access roads. We then mapped Fathom’s flood-risk data to see where it overlapped with these circles. We started by looking for hospitals where at least 20% of the circle’s area had a predicted flood depth of at least 1 foot. That gave us an initial list of more than 320 hospitals across the U.S.

    From there, we visually inspected those hospitals using mapping software and Google Maps, both satellite and street view. We trimmed our list to only the hospitals where a considerable portion of the building or all access roads were predicted to have at least a foot of flooding.

    If two hospitals were mapped to the same building — for instance, a small rehab facility within a large hospital — we counted only one hospital. We also excluded hospitals recently converted to nursing homes or for other uses.

    We ended up with a list of 171 hospitals across the U.S. That is most likely an undercount. Some hospitals could still face significant impact from flooding that is not deep enough or widespread enough to fit our methodology. Our analysis also does not account for how flooding farther from a hospital could affect employees or patients. And it does not assess what steps hospitals may have already taken to prepare for severe weather events.

    We also ran a spatial analysis comparing Fathom’s data with flood hazard maps from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which in many cases are incomplete or haven’t been updated in years. We found that about a third of hospitals identified as flood risks by Fathom’s data did not overlap at all with FEMA’s 100- or 500-year hazard areas.

    Fathom provided guidance and feedback as we developed our analysis.

    CBS News correspondent David Schechter, photojournalist Chance Horner, and producer Aparna Zalani contributed to this report.

    Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

    This <a target="_blank" href="/health-industry/hospital-flooding-risk-investigation-trump-policies-fema/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

    <img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=2093496&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
    2093496
    Watch: Fired CDC Chief Says RFK Jr. Demanded She Roll Back Vaccine Policies Without Evidence /public-health/watch-susan-monarez-fired-cdc-chief-senate-hearing-rfk-jr-vaccines-hepatitis-b/ Wed, 17 Sep 2025 22:40:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2090247

    Susan Monarez, the former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, testified before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee on Sept. 17 in her first public remarks since she was fired. Some Republicans on the committee accused her of lying and said she hadn’t been on board with the administration’s agenda.

    As in earlier hearings concerning Robert F. Kennedy’s performance as secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, the focus was on Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), who cast the deciding vote as HELP Committee chair to confirm Kennedy early this year. Since that vote, Cassidy has repeatedly expressed skepticism about Kennedy’s leadership.

    Cassidy noted that when Kennedy swore in Monarez on July 31, he extolled her “unimpeachable scientific credentials.” Less than a month later, she was fired. “What happened?” Cassidy said. “Turmoil at the top of the nation’s top public health agency is not good for the health of the American people.”

    Monarez said she came into the job aligned with Kennedy’s goals of improving America’s health and was open to changing the policies and structures at the CDC. She wasn’t ready to compromise her scientific judgment, however.

    “I could have kept the office, the title, but I would have lost the one thing that cannot be replaced: my integrity,” she said.

    Monarez said that at an Aug. 25 meeting, Kennedy demanded she fire senior scientists and agree to approve all changes in vaccine policy put forward by the new members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. In June, Kennedy fired its members and replaced them with a smaller group that includes leading opponents of the U.S. vaccination program.

    When Monarez refused both requests, she said, Kennedy told her to resign. She refused, and the White House fired her, she said.

    Kennedy, in testimony this month, denied he’d made the ultimatums and said Monarez had lied. Republican senators repeated that claim at Wednesday’s hearing. Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma said a recording of the Aug. 25 meeting contradicted Monarez’s account. But later in the hearing, Cassidy said that Mullin had retracted his statement, saying there was no such recording.

    The hearing appeared to confirm reports that Kennedy intends to change the childhood vaccine schedule, moving initially against recommending a hepatitis B vaccination shortly after birth, a practice the CDC has supported for more than three decades.

    The that children be vaccinated against 16 pathogens with about 25 shots, sprays, or oral vaccinations in their first two years of life. The vaccines protect kids against such diseases as influenza, measles, whooping cough, meningitis, diarrhea, chickenpox, cancer, and pneumonia. It’s up to states to decide which vaccinations are required for schoolchildren.

    Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.) noted that for decades universal vaccination of newborns for hepatitis B has reduced case rates of the disease among young people by 99%, as reported by Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News. Sens. Ashley Moody (R-Fla.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), and Cassidy (R-La.) asked about plans, first reported by Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News, for ACIP to vote to recommend pushing the first dose of the hepatitis B vaccine from the hours after birth to age 4.

    Cassidy, in closing the hearing, spoke gravely of the dangers of ending the hepatitis B dose for newborns. He noted that before 1991 as many as 20,000 babies would become infected with hepatitis B, often leading to liver disease and sometimes death. Today, fewer than 20 babies a year contract the virus from their mothers, he said.

    A gaggle of reporters holding up their phones and video cameras interview Senator Bill Cassidy in a Senate hallway.
    Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) speaks to reporters after former CDC Director Susan Monarez testified at a hearing of the Senate’s Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee on Sept. 17. (Eric Harkleroad/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

    “That is an accomplishment to make America healthy again, and we should stand up and salute the people that made that decision,” he said.

    Asked by reporters after the hearing whether the American public should have confidence in the advisory committee if it votes to delay the hepatitis B dose for newborns, he replied, “No.”

    Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

    This <a target="_blank" href="/public-health/watch-susan-monarez-fired-cdc-chief-senate-hearing-rfk-jr-vaccines-hepatitis-b/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

    <img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=2090247&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
    2090247
    Watch: Why Is Having a Baby So Expensive in the US? /health-care-costs/watch-having-baby-childbirth-cost-expensive-us-hospital-bills-natalism/ Fri, 12 Sep 2025 09:00:00 +0000

    New moms all over social media are breaking down their incredibly expensive hospital bills after giving birth. So why is giving birth so pricey in the U.S.? And given the Trump administration’s anti-abortion, pro-natalist policies, is anything on the table to make having a child more affordable?

    Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News video producer Hannah Norman spoke with Stephanie Hastings, a physician and an assistant program director at the Cambridge Health Alliance, and Malini Nijagal, an OB-GYN and a clinical professor at the University of California-San Francisco.

    Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

    This <a target="_blank" href="/health-care-costs/watch-having-baby-childbirth-cost-expensive-us-hospital-bills-natalism/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

    <img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=2086173&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
    2086173
    Why Young Americans Dread Turning 26: Health Insurance Chaos /health-care-costs/insurance-cliff-age-26-young-adults-chaos/ Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:00:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2066255 Amid the challenges of adulthood, one rite of passage is unique to the United States: the need to find your own health insurance by the time you turn 26.

    That is the age at which the Affordable Care Act declares that young adults generally must get off their family’s plan and figure out their coverage themselves.

    When the ACA was voted into law in 2010, what’s known as its dependent coverage expansion was immediately effective, to millions of young Americans up to age 26 who would otherwise not have had coverage.

    But for years, Republicans have whittled away at the infrastructure of the original ACA. Long gone is the requirement to buy insurance. Plans sold in the ACA’s online insurance marketplaces have no stringent quality standards. Costs keep rising, and eligibility requirements and subsidies are moving targets.

    The erosion of the law has now created an “insurance cliff” for Americans who are turning 26 and don’t have a job that provides medical coverage.

    Some, scared off by the complexity of picking a policy and by the price tags, tumble over the edge and go without insurance in a health system where the rate for an emergency room visit can be thousands, if not tens of thousands, of dollars.

    Today, an estimated 15% of 26-year-olds go uninsured, which, according to a KFF analysis, is the highest rate among Americans of any age.

    If they qualify, young adults can sign up for Medicaid, the federal-state program for Americans with low incomes or disabilities, in most but not all states.

    Otherwise, many buy cheap subpar insurance that leaves them with insurmountable debt following a medical crisis. Others choose plans with extremely limited networks, losing access to longtime doctors and medicines.

    They often find those policies online, in what has become a dizzyingly complicated system of government-regulated insurance marketplaces created by the ACA.

    The marketplaces vary in quality from state to state; some are far better than others. But they generally offer few easily identifiable, affordable, and workable choices.

    “The good news is that the ACA gave young people more options,” said Karen Pollitz, who directed consumer information and insurance oversight at the Department of Health and Human Services during the Obama administration.

    “The bad news is the good stuff is hidden in a minefield of really bad options that’ll leave you broke if you get sick.”

    (Ethan Evans)
    (Maxwell Frost)

    Publicly funded counselors called “navigators” or “assisters” can help insurance seekers choose a plan. But those programs vary by state, and often customers don’t realize that the help is available. The Trump administration has cut funding to publicize and operate those navigator programs.

    In addition, changes to Medicaid eligibility in the policy bill recently passed by Congress could mean that millions more ACA enrollees , according to the Congressional Budget Office.

    Those changes threaten the very viability of the ACA marketplaces, which currently provide insurance to 24 million Americans.

    In dozens of interviews, young adults described the unsettling and devastating consequences of having inadequate insurance, or no insurance at all.

    Damian Phillips, 26, a reporter at a West Virginia newspaper, considered joining the Navy to get insurance as his 26th birthday approached. Instead, he felt he “didn’t make enough to justify having health insurance” and has reluctantly gone without it.

    Ethan Evans, a 27-year-old aspiring actor in Chicago who works in retail, fell off his parents’ plan and temporarily signed up for Medicaid. But the diminished mental health coverage meant cutting back on visits to his longtime therapist.

    Rep. Maxwell Frost, a Florida Democrat and the first Gen Z member of Congress, was able to quit his job and run for office at 25 only because he could stay on his mother’s plan until he turned 26, he said.

    Now 28, he is insured through his federal job.

    “The ACA was groundbreaking legislation, including the idea that every American needs health care,” he said. “But there are pitfalls, and one of them is that when young adults turn 26, they fall into this abyss.”

    Why 26?

    Back in 2010, the decision to make 26 the cutoff age for staying on a parent’s insurance was “kind of arbitrary,” recalled Nancy-Ann DeParle, deputy chief of staff for policy in the Obama White House.

    “My kids were young , and I was trying to imagine when my child would be an adult.”

    Before that time, children were often kicked off family plans at much younger ages, typically 18.

    The Obama administration’s idea was that young adults were most likely settling into careers and jobs with insurance by 26. If they still didn’t have access to job-based insurance, Medicaid and the ACA marketplaces would offer alternatives, the thinking went.

    But over the years, the courts, Congress, and the first Trump administration eviscerated provisions of the ACA. By 2022, a shopper on a federal government-run marketplace had more than 100 choices, many of which included expensive trade-offs, presented in a way that made comparisons difficult without spreadsheets.

    Jack Galanty, 26, a freelance designer in Los Angeles, tried to plan for his 26th birthday by seeking coverage on the California insurance marketplace that would ensure treatment for his mild cerebral palsy and for HIV prevention.

    “You’re scrolling for what feels like years, looking at 450 little slides, at the little bars, and trying to remember, ‘Was the one I liked No. 12 or 13?’” he recalled. “It feels like it’s nearly impossible to make a good choice in this scenario.”

    (Elizabeth Mathis)
    (Kayla Anderson)

    Out-of-pocket expenses have soared. Complex plans in the lightly regulated marketplaces featured rising premiums, high deductibles, and requirements that patients pay a significant portion of the cost of care, often 20% — a charge known as coinsurance.

    More than half of Americans ages 18 to 29 have incurred medical debt in the past five years, a Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News data investigation found. Few have the reserves to pay it off.

    The networks of doctors to choose from in these plans are often so limited that an insured person struggles to get timely appointments. It can even be hard to find the official websites amid an explosion of look-alikes operated by commercial brokers.

    Sharing her contact information with one site that appeared legitimate left Lydia Herne, a social media producer in Brooklyn, “drowning” in texts and phone calls offering plans of uncertain and unregulated quality. “It never ends,” said Herne, 27.

    Young Invincibles, an advocacy group representing young adults, runs its own “navigator” program to help young people choose health insurance plans.

    “We hear the frustration,” said Martha Sanchez, the group’s former director of health policy and advocacy. “Twenty-six-year-olds have had negative experiences in a process that’s become really complex. Many throw up their hands.”

    Elizabeth Mathis, 29, and Evan Pack, 30, a married couple in Salt Lake City, turned to the marketplaces two years ago, after Pack went uninsured for a “really scary” year after he turned 26.

    “Every time he got in the car, I thought, ‘What if?’” Mathis said.

    The couple pays more than $200 a month for a high-deductible health plan backed by a federal subsidy (the kind set to expire next year). It’s a significant expense, but they wanted to be sure they had access to contraception and an antidepressant.

    But last year, Pack suffered serious eye problems and underwent an emergency appendectomy. Their plan left them $9,000 in debt, for medical care billed at over $20,000.

    “Technically, we gambled in the right direction,” Mathis said. “But I don’t feel like we’ve won.”

    The Affordability Problem

    The ACA was supposed to help consumers find affordable, high-quality plans online. The legislation also tried to expand Medicaid programs, which are administered by states, to provide health insurance to low-income Americans.

    But the Supreme Court ruled in 2012 that states could not be forced to expand Medicaid. Ten states, led mostly by Republicans, have not done so, leaving up to 1.5 million Americans, who could have qualified for coverage, .

    Even where Medicaid is available to 26-year-olds, the transition has often proved precarious.

    Madeline Nelkin of New Jersey, who was studying social work, applied for Medicaid coverage before her 26th birthday in April 2024 because her university’s insurance premiums were more than $5,000 annually.

    But it was September before her Medicaid coverage kicked in, leaving her uninsured while she fought a chest infection over the summer.

    “People tell you to think ahead, but I didn’t think that meant six months,” she said.

    (Daisy Creager)
    (Madeline Nelkin)
    (Valeria Chávez)

    When Megan Hughes, 27, of Hartland, Maine, hit the cliff, she went without. An aide for children with developmental delays, she has a thyroid condition and polycystic ovary syndrome.

    She looked for a health care plan but found it hard to understand the marketplace. (She didn’t know there were navigators who could help.) Now she can’t afford her medicine or see her endocrinologist.

    “I’m tired all the time,” Hughes said. “My cycles are not regular anymore at all. When I do get one, it’s debilitating.” She is hoping a new job will provide insurance later this year.

    Traditionally, most Americans with private health insurance got it through their jobs. But the job market has changed dramatically since the ACA became law, particularly in the wake of the pandemic, with the rise of a gig economy.

    Over said in recent surveys that they were working or have worked in short-term, part-time, or irregular jobs.

    The ACA requires organizations with 50 or more employees to offer insurance to people working 30 hours per week. This has led to a growing number of contract employees who work up to, but not past, the hourly limit.

    Many companies, which say they can’t afford the rising costs of traditional insurance, offer their employees only a modicum of help, perhaps around $200 per month toward buying a marketplace plan, or a bare-bones company plan.

    Young people juggling part-time jobs and insurance options face bumpy, daunting transitions.

    In Oklahoma, Daisy Creager, 29, has had three employers over the past three years. Insurance was important to her, not least because her former husband had Type 1 diabetes.

    As she left the first of those jobs, her husband’s endocrinologist helped the couple stockpile less expensive insulin from Canada, since they would be uninsured.

    After a few months, they bought a marketplace plan, but it was expensive and “didn’t cover a lot,” she said.

    When she found a new job, she dropped that plan, only to discover that her new insurance coverage didn’t start until the end of her first month of employment. The couple would be uninsured for a few weeks.

    A few days later, she came home to find her husband unconscious on the floor, in a diabetic coma. After hovering near death in an intensive care unit for four days, he woke up and began to recover.

    “I think I’ve done everything right,” Creager said. “So why am I in a position where the health insurance available to me doesn’t cover what I need, or I can barely afford my premiums, or worse, at times I don’t even have it?”

    Kathryn Russell, 27, developed excruciating back pain two months before her 26th birthday. After extensive testing, doctors determined she needed a complex surgery, which her surgeon couldn’t schedule until after she would be off her family’s insurance plan.

    Forget the pain and the fear of the operation, she said, it was insurance that kept her up at night. “There’s this impending terror of, ‘What am I going to do?’” she recalled.

    (One day before she turned 26, her father’s company agreed to keep her on his plan for six more months, if he paid higher premiums.)

    The idea that the ACA would offer a variety of good options for people turning 26 has not worked as well as the legislation’s authors had hoped. The “job lock” tying insurance to employment has long plagued the United States workforce.

    Young adults need guidance on their options beforehand, said Sanchez of Young Invincibles. None of those interviewed for this story, for example, knew there were navigators to help them find insurance on the online marketplaces.

    Experts agree that the marketplaces need stronger regulation.

    In 2023, for what plans in each tier of insurance should offer, such as better prescription drug benefits, defined copays for X-rays, or coverage for emergency room visits.

    Certain types of basic care, such as primary care, should require just a small copay for at least a small number of initial visits. Each insurer must offer at least one plan that complies with these new standards for every level, known as an “” option or a “standard plan.”

    Most plans on the marketplaces don’t meet these criteria. Federal and state regulators had long planned to cull such “noncompliant” plans, gradually — fearing that doing so too quickly would scare insurers away from participating.

    But with the priorities of the new Trump administration now in focus, and a Republican majority in Congress, it’s far from clear what course President Donald Trump, who sought to repeal the ACA outright in his first term, will take.

    There are hints: Subsidies to help Americans buy insurance, adopted during the Biden administration, are set to expire at the end of 2025 unless the Republican-led Congress extends them.

    If the subsidies expire, for plans sold on the marketplaces, leaving insurance out of reach for many more young adults.

    Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

    This <a target="_blank" href="/health-care-costs/insurance-cliff-age-26-young-adults-chaos/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

    <img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=2066255&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
    2066255
    Watch: How the FDA Opens the Door to Risky Chemicals in America’s Food Supply /courts/fda-risky-chemicals-food-supply-gras-regulation-explainer-video/ Wed, 07 May 2025 09:00:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2029309

    Lining the shelves of American supermarkets are food products with chemicals linked to health concerns. To a great extent, the FDA allows food companies to determine for themselves whether their ingredients and additives are safe.

    Companies don’t have to tell the FDA about those decisions, and they don’t have to list all ingredients on their product labels. Instead, companies can use broad terms such as “artificial flavors.”

    In 1958, Congress mandated that before additives could be used in foods manufacturers had to prove they were safe and get FDA approval. However, Congress carved out an exception for substances “generally recognized as safe,” which came to be known simply as GRAS.

    As conceived, GRAS promised regulatory relief for standard ingredients like salt, sugar, vinegar, and baking powder. Over time, “the loophole swallowed the law,” said a 2014 Natural Resources Defense Council report.

    Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wants to close or tighten the GRAS loophole. He has railed about the risks of food additives for years and has said he wants to end “the mass poisoning of American children.”

    Whether changes come from the FDA or the food companies, it’s clear Americans are becoming more concerned about what they’re buying.

    Credits

    David Hilzenrath Reporter
    Hannah Norman Video producer & animator
    Oona Zenda Art director & illustrator
    Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

    This <a target="_blank" href="/courts/fda-risky-chemicals-food-supply-gras-regulation-explainer-video/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

    <img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=2029309&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
    2029309
    Watch: What Is Medicaid, Again? /health-care-costs/medicaid-health-insurance-explained-video/ Mon, 24 Feb 2025 10:00:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1989792

    Republicans in Congress have suggested big cuts to Medicaid. But what exactly is it?

    Medicaid, the state-federal health insurance program for people with low incomes or disabilities, is integral to the U.S. health care system. It keeps hospitals and other providers afloat, provides a key source of federal funds to states, and helps provide health insurance to people who couldn’t otherwise afford it. More than 79 million people in the U.S. receive services from Medicaid or the closely related Children’s Health Insurance Program. 

    Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News correspondent Sam Whitehead discusses Medicaid’s history and role in the U.S. health system.

    Learn more here:

    Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

    This <a target="_blank" href="/health-care-costs/medicaid-health-insurance-explained-video/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

    <img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=1989792&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
    1989792
    Hannah Norman, Author at Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News produces in-depth journalism on health issues and is a core operating program of KFF. Mon, 20 Apr 2026 18:09:24 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5 /wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=32 Hannah Norman, Author at Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News 32 32 161476233 Watch: As AI Makes More Health Coverage Decisions, the Risks to Patients Grow /courts/watch-ai-artificial-intelligence-prior-authorization-insurance-coverage-decisions/ Fri, 10 Apr 2026 09:00:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2181021

    This year, executives from nearly every major health insurance company made the same declaration in calls with Wall Street analysts: Using artificial intelligence to make coverage decisions would help save them money.

    Even the Trump administration is testing AI’s usefulness in managing the prior authorization process for the Medicare program, as well as seeking to override AI regulation by states.

    But class action lawsuits have accused insurers of using AI to wrongfully withhold treatment. And outlines the risks of training AI on a current system rife with wrongful denials.

    “There is a world in which using AI could make that worse, or at least replicate a bad human system, because the data that it would be training on is from that bad human system,” said Michelle Mello, a co-author of the study.

    Although, Mello said, the research team found “real positives alongside the risks.”

    In this video produced by Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News’ Hannah Norman, Darius Tahir, a correspondent covering health technology, explains.

    You can read Tahir’s recent coverage of AI’s use by health insurers below:

    Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

    This <a target="_blank" href="/courts/watch-ai-artificial-intelligence-prior-authorization-insurance-coverage-decisions/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

    <img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=2181021&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
    2181021
    RFK Jr. Made Promises in Order To Become Health Secretary. He’s Broken Many of Them. /health-industry/rfk-jr-robert-kennedy-vaccines-broken-promises-senators-cassidy/ Fri, 13 Feb 2026 10:00:00 +0000

    One year after taking charge of the nation’s health department, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. hasn’t held true to many of he made while appealing to U.S. senators concerned about the longtime anti-vaccine activist’s plans for the nation’s care.

    Kennedy squeaked through a narrow Senate vote to be confirmed as head of the Department of Health and Human Services, only after making a number of public and private guarantees about how he would handle vaccine funding and recommendations as secretary.

    Here’s a look at some of the promises Kennedy made during his confirmation process.

    The Childhood Vaccine Schedule

    In two hearings in January 2025, Kennedy repeatedly assured senators that he supported childhood vaccines, noting that all his children were vaccinated.

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) about the money he’s made in the private sector from lawsuits against vaccine makers and accused him of planning to profit from potential future policies making it easier to sue.

    “Kennedy can kill off access to vaccines and make millions of dollars while he does it,” Warren said during the Senate Finance Committee hearing. “Kids might die, but Robert Kennedy can keep cashing in.”

    Warren’s statement prompted an assurance by Kennedy.

    “Senator, I support vaccines,” he said. “I support the childhood schedule. I will do that.”

    Days later, Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, declared Kennedy had pledged to maintain existing vaccine recommendations if confirmed. Cassidy, a physician specializing in liver diseases and a vocal supporter of vaccination, had questioned Kennedy sharply in a hearing about his views on shots.

    “If confirmed, he will maintain the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ recommendations without changes,” Cassidy said during a speech on the Senate floor explaining his vote for Kennedy.

    A few months after he was confirmed, Kennedy fired all the incumbent members of the vaccine advisory panel, known as ACIP, and appointed new members, including several who, like him, oppose some vaccines. The panel’s recommendations soon changed drastically.

    Last month, the CDC removed its universal recommendations for children to receive seven immunizations, those protecting against respiratory syncytial virus, meningococcal disease, flu, covid, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and rotavirus. The move followed a memorandum from the White House calling on the CDC to cull the schedule.

    Now, those vaccines, which researchers estimate have prevented thousands of deaths and millions of illnesses, are recommended by the CDC only for children at high-risk of serious illness or after consultation between doctors and parents.

    In response to questions about Kennedy’s actions on vaccines over the past year, HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said the secretary “continues to follow through on his commitments” to Cassidy.

    “As part of those commitments, HHS accepted Chairman Cassidy’s numerous recommendations for key roles at the agency, retained particular language on the CDC website, and adopted ACIP recommendations,” Nixon added. “Secretary Kennedy talks to the chairman at a regular clip.”

    Cassidy and his office have repeatedly rebuffed questions about whether Kennedy, since becoming secretary, has broken the commitments he made to the senator.

    Vaccine Funding Axed

    Weeks after Kennedy took over the federal health department, the CDC pulled back $11 billion in covid-era grants that local health departments were using to fund vaccination programs, among other initiatives.

    That happened after Kennedy pledged during his confirmation hearings not to undermine vaccine funding.

    Kennedy replied “Yes” when Cassidy asked him directly: “Do you commit that you will not work to impound, divert, or otherwise reduce any funding appropriated by Congress for the purpose of vaccination programs?”

    A federal judge later ordered HHS to distribute the money.

    The National Institutes of Health, part of HHS, also yanked dozens of research grants supporting studies of vaccine hesitancy last year. Kennedy, meanwhile, ordered the cancellation of a half-billion dollars’ worth of mRNA vaccine research in August.

    A Discredited Theory About Autism

    Cassidy said in his floor speech that he received a guarantee from Kennedy that the CDC’s website would not remove statements explaining that vaccines do not cause autism.

    Technically, Kennedy kept his promise not to remove the statements. The website still says that vaccines do not cause autism.

    But late last year, new statements sprung up on the same webpage, baselessly casting doubt on vaccine safety. “The claim ‘vaccines do not cause autism’ is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism,” the now misleadingly reads.

    The webpage also states that the public has largely ignored studies showing vaccines do cause autism.

    That is false. Over decades of research, scientific studies have repeatedly concluded that there is no link between vaccines and autism.

    A controversial 1998 study that captured global attention did link the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine to autism. It was retracted for being fraudulent — though not until a decade after it was published, during which there were sharp declines in U.S. vaccination rates.

    Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

    This <a target="_blank" href="/health-industry/rfk-jr-robert-kennedy-vaccines-broken-promises-senators-cassidy/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

    <img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=2153482&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
    2153482
    Watch: Is MAHA the New MAGA? /health-care-costs/watch-video-make-america-healthy-again-maha-maga-rfk-explainer/ Mon, 09 Feb 2026 10:00:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2152344

    Republicans have hitched themselves to the “Make America Healthy Again” campaign, banking on its popularity to give them an electoral bounce. But the strategy carries risks.

    Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime anti-vaccine activist who rails against Big Pharma and ultraprocessed food, is the leader of the movement. And Americans’ .

    Plus, polls show about reducing health care costs than MAHA priorities such as ending vaccine mandates and promoting raw milk.

    Enhanced Affordable Care Act subsidies expired at the end of 2025, fueling a nationwide affordability debate. Roughly 24 million people buy coverage on the Affordable Care Act marketplaces, and many are now facing premium payments more than double what they faced last year.

    After taking a political back seat in recent years, health care may dominate the 2026 election races.

    Credits

    Bram Sable-Smith Host
    Hannah Norman Video producer
    Stephanie Armour Reporter
    Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

    This <a target="_blank" href="/health-care-costs/watch-video-make-america-healthy-again-maha-maga-rfk-explainer/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

    <img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=2152344&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
    2152344
    Oregon Hospital Races To Build a Tsunami Shelter as FEMA Fights To Cut Its Funding /health-industry/tsunami-shelter-oregon-hospital-fema-funding-cut-lawsuit/ Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:00:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2130169 ASTORIA, Ore. — Residents of this small coastal city in the Pacific Northwest know what to do when there’s a tsunami warning: Flee to higher ground.

    For those in or near Columbia Memorial, the city’s only hospital, there will soon be a different plan: Shelter in place. The hospital is building a new facility next door with an on-site tsunami shelter — an elevated refuge atop columns deeply anchored in the ground, where nearly 2,000 people can safely wait out a flood.

    Oregon needs more shelters like the one that Columbia Memorial is building, emergency managers say. Hospitals in the region are likely to incur serious damage, if not ruin, and could take more than three years to fully recover in the event of a major earthquake and tsunami, according to .

    Columbia Memorial’s current facility is a single-story building, a half-century ago, that would likely collapse and sink into the ground or be swallowed by a landslide after a major earthquake or a tsunami, said Erik Thorsen, the hospital’s chief executive.

    “It is just not built to survive either one of those natural disaster events,” Thorsen said.

    At least 10 other hospitals along the Oregon coast are in danger as well. So Columbia Memorial leaders proposed building a hospital capable of withstanding an earthquake and landslide, with a tsunami shelter, instead of relocating the facility to higher ground. Residents and state officials supported the plans, and the federal government awarded a $14 million grant from the Federal Emergency Management Agency to help pay for the tsunami shelter.

    The project broke ground in October 2024. Within six months, the Trump administration had , known as Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities, or BRIC, calling it “yet another example of a wasteful and ineffective FEMA program … more concerned with political agendas than helping Americans affected by natural disasters.”

    Molly Wing, director of the expansion project, said losing the BRIC grant felt like “a punch to the gut.”

    “We really didn’t see that coming,” she said.

    Molly Wing, director of the Columbia Memorial Hospital expansion project, was crestfallen to learn FEMA had canceled a $14 million grant for a tsunami shelter. “It was pretty devastating,” she says. (Hannah Norman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

    This summer, Oregon and 19 other states sued to restore the FEMA grants. On Dec. 11, a that the Trump administration had unlawfully ended the program without congressional approval.

    The administration did not immediately indicate it would appeal the decision, but Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said by email: “DHS has not terminated BRIC. Any suggestion to the contrary is a lie. The Biden Administration abandoned true mitigation and used BRIC as a green new deal slush fund. It’s unfortunate that an activist judge either didn’t understand that or didn’t care.” FEMA is a subdivision of DHS.

    Columbia Memorial was one of the few hospitals slated to receive grants from the BRIC program, which had announced more than $4.5 billion for nearly 2,000 building projects since 2022.

    Hospital leaders have decided to keep building — with uncertain funding — because they say waiting is too dangerous. With the Trump administration reversing course on BRIC, fewer communities will receive help from FEMA to reduce their disaster risk, even places where catastrophes are likely.

    More than three centuries have passed since a major earthquake caused the Pacific Northwest’s coastline to drop several feet and unleashed a tsunami that crashed onto the land in January 1700, according to scientists who study the evolution of the Oregon coast.

    The greatest danger is an underwater fault line known as the , which lies 70 to 100 miles off the coast, from Northern California to British Columbia.

    The Cascadia zone can produce a megathrust earthquake, with a magnitude of 9 or higher — the type capable of triggering a catastrophic tsunami — , according to the U.S. Geological Survey. Scientists predict a 10% to 15% chance of such an earthquake along the fault zone in the next 50 years.

    “We can’t wait any longer,” Thorsen said. “The risk is high.”

    Design plans for Columbia Memorial Hospital show a five-level building with a rooftop refuge designed to withstand an earthquake and keep people safe from a tsunami. Most patient services will be provided on the second and third levels, above the projected tsunami flood level.

    Building for the Future

    The BRIC program started in 2020, during the first Trump administration, to provide communities and institutions with funding and technical assistance to fortify their structures against natural disasters.

    Joel Scata, a senior attorney with the environmental advocacy group Natural Resources Defense Council, said the program helped communities better prepare so they could reduce the cost of rebuilding after a flood, tornado, wildfire, or extreme weather event.

    To qualify for a grant, a hospital had to show that the project’s benefits were greater than the future danger and cost. In some cases, that benefit might not be readily apparent.

    “It prevents bad disasters from happening, and so you don’t necessarily see it in action,” Scata said.

    Scata noted that the Trump administration has also stopped awarding grants through FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, which predates BRIC.

    “There really is no money going out the door from the federal government to help communities reduce their disaster risk,” he said.

    A recent Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News investigation using proprietary data from Fathom, a global leader in flood modeling, found that at least 170 U.S. hospitals are at risk of significant and potentially dangerous flooding from more intense and frequent storms. That count did not include Columbia Memorial, as Fathom’s data did not account for tsunamis. It models flooding from rivers, sea level rise, and extreme rainfall.

    In recent days, an atmospheric river — a narrow storm band carrying significant amounts of moisture — dumped more than 15 inches of rain on parts of Oregon and Washington, causing catastrophic flooding along rivers and the coast. In the Washington town of Sedro-Woolley, which sits along the Skagit River, the PeaceHealth evacuated nonemergency patients.

    High winds battered Astoria, leaving the city with some minor landslides, according to news reports. But flooding on the road to the nearby beach town of Seaside made the drive nearly impassable.

    The Trump administration is leaning on states to take greater responsibility for recovering from natural disasters, Scata said, but most states are not financially prepared to do so.

    “The disasters are just going to keep on piling up,” he said, “and the federal government’s going to have to keep stepping in.”

    Construction crews broke ground on a new building for Columbia Memorial Hospital in fall 2024. The new facility is budgeted at $300 million and will include a rooftop refuge to withstand a tsunami, accommodating up to 1,900 people. (Hannah Norman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

    A Hospital at Risk

    Columbia Memorial is blocks from the southern shore of the Columbia River, near the Washington border, where the include earthquakes, tsunamis, landslides, and floods. A critical access hospital with 25 beds, it opened in 1977 — before state building codes addressed tsunami protections.

    Thorsen said the new facility and shelter would be a “model design” for other hospitals. Design plans show a five-level hospital built atop a foundation anchored to the bedrock and surrounded by concrete columns to shield it from tsunami debris.

    The shelter will be on the roof of the second floor, above the projected maximum tsunami inundation. It will be accessible via an outdoor staircase and interior staircases and elevators, with enough room for up to 1,900 people, plus food, water, tents, and other supplies to sustain them for five days.

    A line drawing of a building and surround parking lots has colors highlighting the "Tsunami Evacuation Stair", additional stairs inside the building, and two areas marked "Safe Refuge Area."
    The hospital expansion project is expected to be completed by the end of 2027 and will provide Astoria with the city’s only elevated tsunami shelter. (Columbia Memorial Hospital)
    A rendering of a building with an outdoor staircase. On the ground floor, a roof extends from the building over outdoor chairs and tables.
    Plans call for an outdoor staircase leading to a rooftop tsunami refuge capable of holding up to 1,900 people, and enough food, water, tents, and other supplies to sustain them for five days. (Columbia Memorial Hospital)

    With most patient care provided on the second and third levels, generators on the fourth level, and utility lines underground, the hospital is expected to remain operational after a natural disaster.

    Thorsen said an earthquake and tsunami threaten not only vast flooding , in which the ground loosens and causes structures above it to collapse. Deep foundations, thick slabs, and other structural supports are expected to protect the new hospital and tsunami structure against such failure.

    Through the years, hospital administrators and civic leaders in Astoria have sought other locations for Columbia Memorial. But relocation wasn’t economical. Columbia Memorial committed to invest in a new hospital and tsunami shelter to protect not only patients and staff but also nearby residents.

    “Your community should count on your hospital to be a safe haven in a natural disaster,” Thorsen said.

    Columbia Memorial, a 25-bed critical access hospital, opened in Astoria in 1977. (Hannah Norman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

    Fighting To Restore Funds

    The estimated construction budget for Columbia Memorial’s expansion is $300 million, mostly financed through new debt from the hospital. The tsunami shelter is budgeted at about $20 million, for which FEMA’s BRIC program , with a $6 million matching grant from the state, which has maintained its support.

    The shelter and the building’s structural protections — featuring reinforced steel, deeper foundations, and thicker slabs — are integral to the design and cannot be removed without compromising the rest of the structure, said Michelle Checkis, the project architect.

    “We can’t pull the TVERS [tsunami vertical evacuation refuge structure] out without pulling the hospital back apart again,” she said. “It’s kind of like, if I was going to stack it up with Legos, I would have to take all those Legos apart and stack it up completely differently.”

    Michelle Checkis, of ZGF Architects, is the project architect for Columbia Memorial Hospital’s planned expansion. She says the new hospital building was designed to withstand the region’s natural disasters, including earthquakes, tsunamis, and landslides. “Every piece of steel in the building is sized to take that extra load,” she says. “The foundations are deeper to be able to do that. The slabs are thicker.” (Hannah Norman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

    Columbia Memorial has sought help from Oregon’s congressional delegation. In to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and former FEMA acting administrator David Richardson, the lawmakers demanded that the agencies restore the hospital’s grant.

    The hospital’s leadership is seeking other grants and philanthropic donations to make up for the loss. As a last resort, Thorsen said, the board will consider removing “nonessential features” from the building, though he added that there is little fat to trim from the project.

    The in July alleged that FEMA lacks the authority to cancel the BRIC program or redirect its funding for other purposes.

    The states argued that canceling the program and undermined projects underway.

    In their response to the lawsuit, the Trump administration said repeatedly that the defendants “deny that the BRIC program has been terminated.”

    The lawsuit cites examples of projects at risk in each state due to FEMA’s termination of the grants. Oregon’s first example is Columbia Memorial’s tsunami shelter. “Neither the County nor the State can afford to resume the project without federal funding,” the lawsuit states.

    In response to questions about the impact of canceling the grant on Astoria and the surrounding community, DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said BRIC had “deviated from its statutory intent.”

    “BRIC was more focused on climate change initiatives like bicycle lanes, shaded bus stops, and planting trees, rather than disaster relief or mitigation,” McLaughlin said. DHS and FEMA provided no further comment about BRIC or the Astoria hospital.

    A statue of a woman holding a large fish is placed next to a sign reading "Cannery" at Astoria's waterfront. A bridge over the river is behind.
    Fish canning was once the primary industry in Astoria, but the last cannery closed in the 1980s. (Hannah Norman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)
    A cargo ship moves along the Columbia river. Wooden posts stick out of the water in the foreground, closer to shore.
    Astoria sits on a peninsula that juts into the Columbia River near the Pacific Ocean. (Hannah Norman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

    Preparing for a Tsunami Disaster

    Located near the end of the Lewis & Clark National Historic Trail, Astoria sits on a peninsula that juts into the Columbia River near the Pacific Ocean.

    Much of the city is not in the tsunami inundation area. But Astoria’s downtown commercial district — where gift shops, hotels, and seafood restaurants line the streets — is nearly all an evacuation zone.

    Two hospitals — Ocean Beach Health in nearby Washington, and Providence Seaside Hospital in Oregon — are about 20 miles from Columbia Memorial. Both are 25-bed hospitals, and neither is designed to withstand a tsunami.

    Ocean Beach Health regularly conducts drills for mass-casualty and natural disasters, said Brenda Sharkey, its chief nursing officer.

    “We focus our planning and investments on areas where we can make a real difference for our community before, during, and after an event — such as maintaining continuity of care, ensuring rapid triage, and coordinating with regional emergency partners,” Sharkey said in an email.

    In Astoria, waterfront houses on stilts surround a pond connected to the Columbia River. The neighborhood is on the site of a former plywood mill. (Hannah Norman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

    Gary Walker, a spokesperson for Providence Seaside, said in a statement that the hospital has a “comprehensive emergency plan for earthquakes and tsunamis, including alternative sites and mobile resources.”

    Walker added that Providence Seaside has hired “a team of consultants and experts to conduct a conceptual resilience study” that would evaluate the hospital’s vulnerabilities and recommend ways to address them.

    Oregon’s emergency managers advise residents and visitors in coastal communities to immediately seek higher ground after a major earthquake — and not to rely on tsunami sirens, social media, or most technology.

    “There may not even be cellphone towers operating after an event like this,” said Jonathan Allan, a coastal geomorphologist with the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries. “The earthquake shaking, its intensity, and particularly the length of time in which the shaking persists, is the warning message.”

    The stronger the earthquake and the longer the shaking, he said, the more likely a tsunami will head to shore.

    A tsunami triggered by a Cascadia zone earthquake could strike land in , according to state estimates.

    Many of Oregon’s seaside communities are near high-enough ground to seek safety from a tsunami in a relatively short time, Allan said. But he estimated that, to save lives, Oregon would need about a dozen vertical tsunami evacuation shelters along the coast, including in seaside towns that attract tourists and where the nearest high ground is a mile or more away.

    Willis Van Dusen’s family has lived in Astoria since the mid-19th century. A former mayor of Astoria, Van Dusen stressed that tsunamis are not a hypothetical danger. He recalled seeing one in Seaside in 1964. The wave was only about 18 inches high, he said, but it flooded a road and destroyed a bridge and some homes. The memory has stayed with him.

    “It’s not like … ‘Oh, that’ll never happen,’” he said. “We have to be prepared for it.”

    A man with white hair and dark glasses speaks to someone just off-camera.
    Willis Van Dusen, a former mayor of Astoria, says that tsunamis are not a hypothetical danger. “We have to be prepared for it,” he says. (Hannah Norman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)
    A "Tsunami Evacuation Map" for the Basin & Riverwalk is shown on a metal post. A railroad crossing sign, tree, and streetlight are out of focus behind it.
    People in Astoria are advised to seek higher ground when a tsunami warning is issued. Evacuation maps posted on city streets show them where to flee for safety. (Hannah Norman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

    Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News correspondent Brett Kelman contributed to this report.

    Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

    This <a target="_blank" href="/health-industry/tsunami-shelter-oregon-hospital-fema-funding-cut-lawsuit/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

    <img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=2130169&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
    2130169
    At Least 170 US Hospitals Face Major Flood Risk. Experts Say Trump Is Making It Worse. /health-industry/hospital-flooding-risk-investigation-trump-policies-fema/ Wed, 01 Oct 2025 10:01:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2093496
    Flood risk data provided by Fathom shows estimated flooding at four American hospitals. CAMC Memorial and Sherman Oaks Hospital officials said in statements that they were aware of their flood risk and had prepared by obtaining deployable flood barriers and elevating their infrastructure. Representatives for Peninsula Hospital and Kadlec Regional Medical Center declined to answer questions about flooding. (Hannah Norman and Brett Kelman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

    LOUISVILLE, Tenn. — When a big storm hits, Peninsula Hospital could be underwater.

    At this decades-old psychiatric hospital on the edge of the Tennessee River, an intense storm could submerge the building in 11 feet of water, cutting off all roads around the facility, according to a sophisticated computer simulation of flood risk.

    Aurora, a young woman who was committed to Peninsula as a teenager, said the hospital sits so close to the river that it felt like a moat keeping her and dozens of other patients inside. Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News agreed not to publish her full name because she shared private medical history.

    “My first feeling is doom,” Aurora said as she watched the simulation of the river rising around the hospital. “These are probably some of the most vulnerable people.”

    Covenant Health, which runs Peninsula Hospital, said in a statement it has a “proactive and thorough approach to emergency planning” but declined to provide details or answer questions.

    Peninsula is one of about 170 American hospitals, totaling nearly 30,000 patient beds from coast to coast, that face the greatest risk of significant or dangerous flooding, according to a months-long Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News investigation based on data provided by Fathom, a company considered a leader in flood simulation. At many of these hospitals, flooding from heavy storms has the potential to jeopardize patient care, block access to emergency rooms, and force evacuations. Sometimes there is no other hospital nearby.

    A woman wearing a yellow t-shirt and jeans stands with her back to the camera and looks an a building at the other end of a long driveway. Her dark hair is in two braids and her hands are clasped behind her back.
    Aurora, a former Peninsula Hospital patient, looks at the Tennessee psychiatric hospital where she was committed as a teenager. Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News agreed not to publish her full name because she shared private medical history. (Brett Kelman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

    Much of this risk to hospitals is not captured by flood maps issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which have served as the nation’s de facto tool for flood estimation for half a century, despite being incomplete and sometimes decades out of date. As FEMA’s maps have become divorced from the reality of a changing climate, private companies like Fathom have filled the gap with simulations of future floods. But many of their predictions are behind a paywall, leaving the public mostly reliant on free, significantly limited government maps.

    “This is highly concerning,” said Caleb Dresser, who studies climate change and is both an emergency room doctor and a Harvard University assistant professor. “If you don’t have the information to know you’re at risk, then how can you triage that problem?”

    The deadliest hospital flooding in modern American history occurred 20 years ago during Hurricane Katrina, when the bodies of 45 people were recovered from New Orleans’ Memorial Medical Center, including some patients whom investigators . More flooding deaths were narrowly avoided one year ago when helicopters rescued dozens of people as Hurricane Helene engulfed Unicoi County Hospital in Erwin, Tennessee.

    Rebecca Harrison, a paramedic, called her children from the Unicoi roof to say goodbye.

    “I was scared to death, thinking, ‘This is it,’” Harrison told CBS News, which interviewed Unicoi survivors as part of Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News’ investigation. “Alarms were going off. People were screaming. It was chaos.”

    A woman with her blonde hair up in ponytail organizes items in a plastic container while sitting inside an ambulance. Her white polo shirt reads "R. Harrison, Chief of EMS" and has an emblem on the front. The left sleeve reads "Unicoi County EMS".
    Rebecca Harrison, a paramedic, was rescued from the rooftop of Unicoi County Hospital in Erwin, Tennessee, during severe flooding caused by Hurricane Helene in September 2024. “I was never so happy to see helicopters,” she says. (Chance Horner/CBS News)

    The investigation — among the first to analyze nationwide hospital flood risk in an era of warming climate and worsening storms — comes as the administration of President Donald Trump has slashed and and also dismantled FEMA programs designed to protect hospitals and other important buildings from floods.

    When asked to comment, FEMA said flooding is a common, costly, and “under appreciated” disaster but made no statement specific to hospitals. Spokesperson Daniel Llargués defended the administration’s changes to FEMA by reissuing an August statement that dismissed criticism as coming from “bureaucrats who presided over decades of inefficiency.”

    Alice Hill, an Obama administration climate risk expert, said the Trump administration’s dismissal of climate change and worsening floods would waste billions of dollars and endanger lives.

    In 2015, Hill led the creation of the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard, which required that hospitals and other essential structures be elevated or incorporate extra flood protections to qualify for federal funding.

    FEMA  the standard in March.

    “People will die as a result of some of the choices being made today,” Hill said. “We will be less prepared than we are now. And we already were, in my estimation, poorly prepared.”

    ‘Flood Risk Is Everywhere’

    The Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News investigation identified more than 170 hospitals facing a flood risk by comparing the locations of more than 7,000 facilities to , a United Kingdom company that simulates flooding in spaces as small as 10 meters using laser-precision elevation measurements from the .

    Hospitals were determined to have a significant risk if Fathom’s 100-year flood data predicted that a foot or more of water could reach a considerable portion of their buildings, excluding parking garages, or cut off road access to the hospital. A 100-year flood is an intense weather event that has roughly a 1% chance of occurring in any given year but can happen more often.

    The investigation found heightened flood risks at large trauma centers, small rural hospitals, children’s hospitals, and long-term care facilities that serve older and disabled patients. At least 21 are critical access hospitals, with the next-closest hospital 25 miles away, on average.

    Flooding threatens dozens of hospitals in coastal areas, including in Florida, Louisiana, Texas, and New York. Farther inland, flooding of rivers or creeks could envelop other hospitals, particularly in Appalachia and the Midwest. Even in the sun-soaked cities and arid expanses of the American West, storms have the potential to surround some hospitals with several feet of pooling water, according to Fathom’s data.

    These findings are likely an undercount of hospitals at risk because the investigation overlooked pockets of potential flooding at some hospitals. It excluded facilities like stand-alone ERs, outpatient clinics, and nursing homes.

    “The reality is that flood risk is everywhere. It is the most pervasive of perils,” said Oliver Wing, the chief scientific officer at Fathom, who reviewed the findings. “Just because you’ve never experienced an extreme doesn’t mean you never will.”

    Dresser, the ER doctor, said even a small amount of flooding can shut down an unprepared hospital, often by interrupting its power supply, which is needed for life-sustaining equipment like ventilators and heart monitors. He said the most vulnerable hospitals would likely be in rural areas.

    “A lot of rural hospitals are now closing their pediatric units, closing their psychiatry units,” Dresser said. “In a financially stressed situation, it can be hard to prioritize long-term threats, even if they are, for some institutions, potentially existential.”

    Urban hospitals can face dangerous flooding, too. Fathom’s data predicts 5 to 15 feet of water around neighboring hospitals — Kadlec Regional Medical Center and Lourdes Behavioral Health — that straddle a tiny creek in Richland, Washington.

    By Fathom’s estimate, a 100-year flood could cause the nearby Columbia River to spill over a levee that protects Richland, then loosely follow the creek to the hospitals. Some of the deepest flooding is estimated around Lourdes, which was built on land the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers set aside in 1961 as a “ponding and drainage easement.”

    At the time, this land was supposed to be capable of storing enough water to fill at least 40 Olympic-size swimming pools, according to obtained through the Freedom of Information Act. A mental health facility has occupied this spot since the 1970s.

    (Hannah Norman and Brett Kelman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

    Both Kadlec and Lourdes said in statements that they have disaster plans but did not answer questions about flooding. Tina Baumgardner, a Lourdes spokesperson, said government flood maps show the hospital is not in a 100-year flood plain.

    This is not uncommon. Of the more than 170 hospitals with significant flood risk identified by Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News, one-third are located in areas that FEMA has not designated as flood hazard zones.

    Sometimes the difference is stark. For example, at Ochsner Choctaw General in Alabama — the only hospital for 30 miles in any direction — FEMA maps suggest a 100-year flood would overflow a nearby creek but spare the hospital. Fathom’s data predicts the same event would flood most of the hospital with 1 to 2 feet of water, including the ER and the helicopter pad.

    Ochsner Health did not answer questions about flooding preparations at Choctaw General.

    FEMA flood maps were launched in the ’60s as part of the National Flood Insurance Program to determine where insurance is required and building codes should include flood-proofing. According to a FEMA statement, the maps show only a “snapshot in time” and are not intended to predict where flooding will or won’t happen.

    FEMA spokesperson Geoff Harbaugh said the agency intends to modernize its maps through the Future of Flood Risk Data initiative, which will enable the agency to “better project flood risk” and give Americans “the information they need to protect their lives and property.”

    The program was launched by the first Trump administration in 2019 but has since received sparse public updates. Harbaugh declined to provide a detailed update or timeline for the program.

    Chad Berginnis, executive director of the Association of State Floodplain Managers, said it is unknown whether FEMA is still trying to upgrade its maps under Trump, as the agency has cut off communications with outside flooding experts.

    “There has been not a single bit of loosening of what I’m calling the FEMA cone of silence,” Berginnis said. “I’ve never seen anything like it.”

    Floods are expected to worsen as a warming climate fuels stronger storms, drenching areas that are already flood-prone and bringing a new level of flooding to areas once considered lower risk.

    The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has said that 2024 was the warmest year on record — more than 2 degrees Fahrenheit higher than the 20th-century average. Scientists across the globe that each degree of global warming correlates to a 4% increase in the intensity of extreme rainfall.

    “Warmer air can hold more moisture, so this leads us to experience heavier downpours,” said Kelly Van Baalen, a sea level rise expert at the nonprofit . “A 100-year flood today could be a 10-year flood tomorrow.”

    Intensifying storms raise concerns about Peninsula Hospital, which has operated for decades mere feet from the Tennessee River but has no known history of flooding.

    (Hannah Norman and Brett Kelman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

    Peninsula spokesperson Josh Cox said the river is overseen by the Tennessee Valley Authority, which uses dams to manage water levels and generate electricity. Estimates provided by the TVA suggest the dams could keep Peninsula dry even in a 500-year flood.

    Fathom, however, said its flood simulation accounts for the dams and stressed that a large enough storm could drop more rain than even the TVA could control. These predictions are echoed by another flood modeling firm, , which also says an intense storm could cause more than 10 feet of flooding in the area around Peninsula.

    “It’s a hospital right on the banks of a major American river,” said Wing, the Fathom scientist. “It just isn’t conceivable that such a location is risk-free.”

    Jack Goodwin, 75, a retired TVA employee who has lived next to Peninsula for three decades, said he was confident the dams could protect the area. But after reviewing Fathom’s predictions, Goodwin began to research flood insurance.

    “Water can rise quickly and suddenly, and the destruction is tremendous,” he said. “Just because we’ve never seen it here doesn’t mean we won’t see it.”

    A low building is shown surrounded by trees and with a river behind it.
    Peninsula Hospital, a psychiatric hospital southwest of Knoxville on the edge of the Tennessee River, could be surrounded by 11 feet of water in an intense storm, according to flood simulations by Fathom. Covenant Health, which owns Peninsula, said it has planned for emergencies but declined to discuss the possibility of flooding at the hospital. (Brett Kelman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)
    In a photo taken from a craft on a river, a single-story building building sits near the water. There is a fenced-in playground, a shed, a gazebo, and a small parking lot surrounding the building. Trees can be seen in the distance behind the building and its grounds.
    Peninsula Hospital is so close to the Tennessee River that it felt like a moat that kept patients inside, says Aurora, a young woman who was committed to the hospital as a teenager. Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News agreed not to publish her full name because she shared private medical history. Covenant Health, which runs Peninsula, said it has planned for emergencies but declined to discuss flood risk. (Brett Kelman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

    ‘All the Elements of a Real Disaster’

    One year ago, as Hurricane Helene carved a deadly path across Southern Appalachia, Angel Mitchell was visiting her ailing mother at Unicoi County Hospital in the tiny town of Erwin, Tennessee.

    Swollen by Helene, the nearby Nolichucky River spilled over its banks and around the hospital, which was built in a flood plain. Staff tried to bar the doors, Mitchell said, but the water got in, trapping her and others inside. The lights went out. People fled to the roof, where the roar of rushing water nearly drowned out the approach of rescue helicopters, Mitchell said.

    Ultimately, 70 people from the hospital, including Mitchell and her mother, were airlifted to safety on Sept. 27, 2024. The hospital remains closed, and the company that owns it, Ballad Health, has said its .

    “Why allow something — especially a hospital — to be built in an area like that?” Mitchell told CBS News. “People have to rely on these areas to get medical help, and they’re dangerous.”

    A woman with wavy brown hair and wearing a gray shirt looks off-camera to her left.
    Angel Mitchell and her mother were rescued from catastrophic flooding at Unicoi County Hospital in Erwin, Tennessee, during Hurricane Helene in September 2024. “Seeing any of those patients get out of that water, it was a miracle,” Mitchell says. “God was with us.” (Chance Horner/CBS News)
    A photo of brown flood waters swallowing up ambulances.
    Hospital staffers and emergency responders tried to evacuate patients first by ambulance and then by boat when the Nolichucky River overwhelmed Unicoi County Hospital during Hurricane Helene. Eventually, everyone was evacuated by helicopter. (Ballad Health)

    Beyond Unicoi, Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News identified 39 inland hospitals — including 16 in Appalachia — that Fathom predicts could flood when nearby rivers, creeks, or drainage canals overspill their banks, even in storms far less intense than Helene.

    For example, in the Cumberland Mountains of southwestern Virginia, a 100-year flood is projected to cause Slate Creek to engulf Buchanan General Hospital in more than 5 feet of water.

    Near the Great Lakes in Erie, Pennsylvania, LECOM Medical Center and Behavioral Health Pavilion could become flooded by a small drainage creek that is less than 50 feet from the front door of the ER.

    Neither Buchanan nor LECOM responded to questions about flooding or preparations.

    And in West Virginia’s capital of Charleston, where about 50,000 people live at the junction of two rivers in a wide and flat valley, a single storm could potentially flood five of the city’s six hospitals at once, along with schools, churches, fire departments, and other facilities.

    “I hate to say it,” said Behrang Bidadian, a flood plain manager at the , “but it has all the elements of a real disaster.”

    (Hannah Norman and Brett Kelman/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

    At the largest hospital in Charleston, CAMC Memorial Hospital, Fathom predicts that the Kanawha River could bring as much as 5 feet of flooding to the ER. Across town, the Elk River could surround CAMC Women and Children’s Hospital, cutting off all exits.

    And in the center of the city, where the overflowing rivers are predicted to merge, Thomas Orthopedic Hospital could be besieged by more than 10 feet of water on three sides.

    WVU Medicine, which owns Thomas Orthopedic Hospital, did not respond to requests for comment.

    CAMC spokesperson Dale Witte said the hospital system is aware of its flood risk and has prepared by elevating electrical infrastructure and acquiring flood-proofing equipment, like a deployable floodwall. CAMC also regularly revises and drills its disaster plans, Witte said, although he added that hospitals there have never been tested by a real flood.

    Several buildings can be seen a short distance from a river, beyond a road and some houses. Steps lead down the riverbank to dock and boat.
    The largest hospital in Charleston, West Virginia, CAMC Memorial, is located near the Kanawha River, which runs the length of the city. Fathom, a flood modeling company, predicts that extreme weather could cause the river to overspill its banks and bring as much as 5 feet of flooding to the hospital’s ER. (Daniel Chang/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)
    Several buildings can be seen on the banks of a river on slightly higher ground.
    CAMC Women and Children’s Hospital in Charleston, West Virginia, is located on the banks of the Elk River. Extreme weather could cause the river to swell beyond its banks and surround the hospital, closing off all exits, according to a simulation of flooding data from Fathom. CAMC spokesperson Dale Witte said the hospital system has prepared by elevating electrical infrastructure and acquiring pumps. (Daniel Chang/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)
    Building surround a road looping around a greenspace with walkways and a sign reading "WVU Medicine".
    Thomas Orthopedic Hospital is located near the juncture of the Elk and Kanawha rivers in Charleston, West Virginia. A severe rainstorm, the kind that is occurring more frequently due to a warming climate, could engulf the facility with more than 10 feet of water on three sides, according to data from Fathom. (Daniel Chang/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)
    A hospital building is shown at a road intersection with a traffic light.
    CAMC General Hospital in Charleston, West Virginia, is one of five large medical centers in the city that are vulnerable to a 100-year flood, according to a simulation from Fathom. A 100-year flood has roughly a 1% chance of happening in any given year but can occur more often. (Daniel Chang/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

      Shanen Wright, 48, a lifelong Charleston resident who lives near CAMC Memorial, said many in the city have little worry about flooding in the face of more immediate problems, like the opioid epidemic and the decline of manufacturing and mining.

      Tugboats and coal barges sail past his neighborhood as if they were cars on his street.

      “It’s not to say it’s not a possibility,” he said. “I’m sure the people in Asheville and the people in Texas, where the floods took so many lives, they probably didn’t see it coming either.”

      A man with sandy-gray hair and beard, wearing glasses, a navy blue t-shirt, khaki shorts, and sneakers stands on grass and looks at the camera. His hands are in his pockets. Behind him is a river, a boat on the river, and buildings on the opposite shore, including a golden dome in the distance.
      Shanen Wright has lived in Charleston, West Virginia, nearly five decades and says he has never seen the Kanawha River rise above its banks. Located at the junction of two rivers in a wide and flat valley, Charleston is at risk of a single storm potentially flooding the city’s five largest hospitals at once, according to flood data from the company Fathom. (Daniel Chang/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

      ‘The Water Is Coming’

      Despite wide scientific consensus that climate change fuels more dangerous weather, the Trump administration has that concerns about global warming are overblown. In a speech to the United Nations in September, Trump called climate change “the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world.”

      The Trump administration has made deep staff and funding cuts to FEMA, NOAA, and the National Weather Service. At FEMA, the cuts prompted 191 current and former employees to in August warning that the agency is being dismantled from within.

      Daniel Swain, a University of California climate scientist, said the administration’s rejection of climate change has left the nation less prepared for extreme weather, now and in the future.

      “It’s akin to enforcing malpractice scientifically,” Swain said. “Imagine making a medical decision where you are not allowed to look at 20% of the patient’s vital signs or test results.”

      The interior of a destroyed build where metal hangs from the ceiling and drywall, debris, and mud cover the floor.
      Unicoi County Hospital in Erwin, Tennessee, was destroyed by a flash flood during Hurricane Helene in late September 2024. During the worst of the flooding, murky, brown rapids surrounded the hospital building, with 12 feet of water on all sides. (Lauren Sausser/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

      Under Trump, FEMA has also taken actions critics say will leave the nation more vulnerable to flooding, specifically:

      • FEMA disbanded the Technical Mapping Advisory Council, which had to modernize its flood maps to estimate future risk and account for the impacts of climate change.
      • FEMA canceled its program, which provided grants to help communities and vital buildings, including hospitals, protect themselves from floods and other natural disasters.
      • And after stopping enforcement early this year, FEMA the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard, which was designed to harden buildings against future floods and save tax dollars in the long run.

      Berginnis, of the Association of State Floodplain Managers, said the administration’s unwillingness to prepare for climate change and worsening storms would result in a dangerous and costly cycle of flooding, rebuilding, and flooding again.

      “The president is saying we are closed for business when it comes to hazard mitigation,” Berginnis said. “It bugs me to no end that we have to have reminders — like people dying — to show us why it’s important to make these investments.”

      FEMA did not answer specific questions about these decisions. In the statement to Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News, spokesperson Llargués touted the administration’s response to flooding in Texas and New Mexico and said FEMA had provided billions of dollars to help people and communities recover and rebuild. He did not mention any FEMA funding for protecting against future floods.

      Few hospitals understand this threat more than the former Coney Island Hospital in New York City, which has suffered catastrophic flooding before and has prepared for it to come again.

      Superstorm Sandy in 2012 forced the hospital to evacuate hundreds of patients. When the water receded, fish and a sea turtle were found in the building.

      Eleven years later, the facility reopened as Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hospital, transformed by a FEMA-funded $923 million reconstruction project that added a 4-foot floodwall and elevated patient care areas and utility infrastructure above the first floor.

      It is now likely one of the most flood-proofed hospitals in the nation.

      But, so far, no storm has tested the facility.

      Svetlana Lipyanskaya, CEO of NYC Health+Hospitals/South Brooklyn Health, which includes the rebuilt hospital, said the question of flooding is “not an if but a when.”

      “I hope it doesn’t happen in my lifetime,” she said, “but frankly, I’d be surprised. The water is coming.”

      Methodology

      After Hurricane Helene made landfall a year ago, a raging river flooded a rural hospital in eastern Tennessee. Patients and employees were rescued from the rooftop. Floods have hit hospitals from New York to Nebraska to Texas in recent years. We wanted to determine how many other U.S. hospitals face similar peril. Ultimately, we found more than 170 hospitals at risk.

      For this analysis, we used data from , a United Kingdom-based company that specializes in flood-risk modeling across the globe. To assess the United States’ vulnerability, Fathom uses sophisticated computer simulations and detailed terrain data covering the country. It accounts for environmental factors such as climate change, soil conditions, and many rivers and creeks not mapped by other sources. Fathom’s modeling has been and , the World Bank, the Nature Conservancy, and government agencies in Florida, Texas, and elsewhere. The Iowa Flood Center has .

      Through a data use agreement, Fathom shared its U.S. mapping data that predicts areas with at least a 1% chance of flooding in any given year. Fathom’s data estimates the effects of of flooding: coastal, fluvial (from overflowing rivers, lakes, or streams), and pluvial (rainfall that the ground can’t absorb). The data also accounts for dams, reservoirs, and other structures that defend against floods.

      To identify at-risk hospitals, we used a publicly available Department of Homeland Security database containing the GPS coordinates of more than 7,000 short-term acute, critical access, rehab, and psychiatric hospitals — basically any hospital with inpatient services. (DHS under the Trump administration has discontinued public access to the database, so data for hospitals and other infrastructure is no longer widely available.)

      Using GPS coordinates as the centerpoint, we created a circle with a 150-yard radius around each hospital, which in most cases captured the building plus nearby grounds and access roads. We then mapped Fathom’s flood-risk data to see where it overlapped with these circles. We started by looking for hospitals where at least 20% of the circle’s area had a predicted flood depth of at least 1 foot. That gave us an initial list of more than 320 hospitals across the U.S.

      From there, we visually inspected those hospitals using mapping software and Google Maps, both satellite and street view. We trimmed our list to only the hospitals where a considerable portion of the building or all access roads were predicted to have at least a foot of flooding.

      If two hospitals were mapped to the same building — for instance, a small rehab facility within a large hospital — we counted only one hospital. We also excluded hospitals recently converted to nursing homes or for other uses.

      We ended up with a list of 171 hospitals across the U.S. That is most likely an undercount. Some hospitals could still face significant impact from flooding that is not deep enough or widespread enough to fit our methodology. Our analysis also does not account for how flooding farther from a hospital could affect employees or patients. And it does not assess what steps hospitals may have already taken to prepare for severe weather events.

      We also ran a spatial analysis comparing Fathom’s data with flood hazard maps from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which in many cases are incomplete or haven’t been updated in years. We found that about a third of hospitals identified as flood risks by Fathom’s data did not overlap at all with FEMA’s 100- or 500-year hazard areas.

      Fathom provided guidance and feedback as we developed our analysis.

      CBS News correspondent David Schechter, photojournalist Chance Horner, and producer Aparna Zalani contributed to this report.

      Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

      This <a target="_blank" href="/health-industry/hospital-flooding-risk-investigation-trump-policies-fema/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

      <img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=2093496&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
      2093496
      Watch: Fired CDC Chief Says RFK Jr. Demanded She Roll Back Vaccine Policies Without Evidence /public-health/watch-susan-monarez-fired-cdc-chief-senate-hearing-rfk-jr-vaccines-hepatitis-b/ Wed, 17 Sep 2025 22:40:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2090247

      Susan Monarez, the former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, testified before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee on Sept. 17 in her first public remarks since she was fired. Some Republicans on the committee accused her of lying and said she hadn’t been on board with the administration’s agenda.

      As in earlier hearings concerning Robert F. Kennedy’s performance as secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, the focus was on Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), who cast the deciding vote as HELP Committee chair to confirm Kennedy early this year. Since that vote, Cassidy has repeatedly expressed skepticism about Kennedy’s leadership.

      Cassidy noted that when Kennedy swore in Monarez on July 31, he extolled her “unimpeachable scientific credentials.” Less than a month later, she was fired. “What happened?” Cassidy said. “Turmoil at the top of the nation’s top public health agency is not good for the health of the American people.”

      Monarez said she came into the job aligned with Kennedy’s goals of improving America’s health and was open to changing the policies and structures at the CDC. She wasn’t ready to compromise her scientific judgment, however.

      “I could have kept the office, the title, but I would have lost the one thing that cannot be replaced: my integrity,” she said.

      Monarez said that at an Aug. 25 meeting, Kennedy demanded she fire senior scientists and agree to approve all changes in vaccine policy put forward by the new members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. In June, Kennedy fired its members and replaced them with a smaller group that includes leading opponents of the U.S. vaccination program.

      When Monarez refused both requests, she said, Kennedy told her to resign. She refused, and the White House fired her, she said.

      Kennedy, in testimony this month, denied he’d made the ultimatums and said Monarez had lied. Republican senators repeated that claim at Wednesday’s hearing. Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma said a recording of the Aug. 25 meeting contradicted Monarez’s account. But later in the hearing, Cassidy said that Mullin had retracted his statement, saying there was no such recording.

      The hearing appeared to confirm reports that Kennedy intends to change the childhood vaccine schedule, moving initially against recommending a hepatitis B vaccination shortly after birth, a practice the CDC has supported for more than three decades.

      The that children be vaccinated against 16 pathogens with about 25 shots, sprays, or oral vaccinations in their first two years of life. The vaccines protect kids against such diseases as influenza, measles, whooping cough, meningitis, diarrhea, chickenpox, cancer, and pneumonia. It’s up to states to decide which vaccinations are required for schoolchildren.

      Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.) noted that for decades universal vaccination of newborns for hepatitis B has reduced case rates of the disease among young people by 99%, as reported by Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News. Sens. Ashley Moody (R-Fla.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), and Cassidy (R-La.) asked about plans, first reported by Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News, for ACIP to vote to recommend pushing the first dose of the hepatitis B vaccine from the hours after birth to age 4.

      Cassidy, in closing the hearing, spoke gravely of the dangers of ending the hepatitis B dose for newborns. He noted that before 1991 as many as 20,000 babies would become infected with hepatitis B, often leading to liver disease and sometimes death. Today, fewer than 20 babies a year contract the virus from their mothers, he said.

      A gaggle of reporters holding up their phones and video cameras interview Senator Bill Cassidy in a Senate hallway.
      Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) speaks to reporters after former CDC Director Susan Monarez testified at a hearing of the Senate’s Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee on Sept. 17. (Eric Harkleroad/Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News)

      “That is an accomplishment to make America healthy again, and we should stand up and salute the people that made that decision,” he said.

      Asked by reporters after the hearing whether the American public should have confidence in the advisory committee if it votes to delay the hepatitis B dose for newborns, he replied, “No.”

      Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

      This <a target="_blank" href="/public-health/watch-susan-monarez-fired-cdc-chief-senate-hearing-rfk-jr-vaccines-hepatitis-b/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

      <img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=2090247&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
      2090247
      Watch: Why Is Having a Baby So Expensive in the US? /health-care-costs/watch-having-baby-childbirth-cost-expensive-us-hospital-bills-natalism/ Fri, 12 Sep 2025 09:00:00 +0000

      New moms all over social media are breaking down their incredibly expensive hospital bills after giving birth. So why is giving birth so pricey in the U.S.? And given the Trump administration’s anti-abortion, pro-natalist policies, is anything on the table to make having a child more affordable?

      Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News video producer Hannah Norman spoke with Stephanie Hastings, a physician and an assistant program director at the Cambridge Health Alliance, and Malini Nijagal, an OB-GYN and a clinical professor at the University of California-San Francisco.

      Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

      This <a target="_blank" href="/health-care-costs/watch-having-baby-childbirth-cost-expensive-us-hospital-bills-natalism/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

      <img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=2086173&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
      2086173
      Why Young Americans Dread Turning 26: Health Insurance Chaos /health-care-costs/insurance-cliff-age-26-young-adults-chaos/ Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:00:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2066255 Amid the challenges of adulthood, one rite of passage is unique to the United States: the need to find your own health insurance by the time you turn 26.

      That is the age at which the Affordable Care Act declares that young adults generally must get off their family’s plan and figure out their coverage themselves.

      When the ACA was voted into law in 2010, what’s known as its dependent coverage expansion was immediately effective, to millions of young Americans up to age 26 who would otherwise not have had coverage.

      But for years, Republicans have whittled away at the infrastructure of the original ACA. Long gone is the requirement to buy insurance. Plans sold in the ACA’s online insurance marketplaces have no stringent quality standards. Costs keep rising, and eligibility requirements and subsidies are moving targets.

      The erosion of the law has now created an “insurance cliff” for Americans who are turning 26 and don’t have a job that provides medical coverage.

      Some, scared off by the complexity of picking a policy and by the price tags, tumble over the edge and go without insurance in a health system where the rate for an emergency room visit can be thousands, if not tens of thousands, of dollars.

      Today, an estimated 15% of 26-year-olds go uninsured, which, according to a KFF analysis, is the highest rate among Americans of any age.

      If they qualify, young adults can sign up for Medicaid, the federal-state program for Americans with low incomes or disabilities, in most but not all states.

      Otherwise, many buy cheap subpar insurance that leaves them with insurmountable debt following a medical crisis. Others choose plans with extremely limited networks, losing access to longtime doctors and medicines.

      They often find those policies online, in what has become a dizzyingly complicated system of government-regulated insurance marketplaces created by the ACA.

      The marketplaces vary in quality from state to state; some are far better than others. But they generally offer few easily identifiable, affordable, and workable choices.

      “The good news is that the ACA gave young people more options,” said Karen Pollitz, who directed consumer information and insurance oversight at the Department of Health and Human Services during the Obama administration.

      “The bad news is the good stuff is hidden in a minefield of really bad options that’ll leave you broke if you get sick.”

      (Ethan Evans)
      (Maxwell Frost)

      Publicly funded counselors called “navigators” or “assisters” can help insurance seekers choose a plan. But those programs vary by state, and often customers don’t realize that the help is available. The Trump administration has cut funding to publicize and operate those navigator programs.

      In addition, changes to Medicaid eligibility in the policy bill recently passed by Congress could mean that millions more ACA enrollees , according to the Congressional Budget Office.

      Those changes threaten the very viability of the ACA marketplaces, which currently provide insurance to 24 million Americans.

      In dozens of interviews, young adults described the unsettling and devastating consequences of having inadequate insurance, or no insurance at all.

      Damian Phillips, 26, a reporter at a West Virginia newspaper, considered joining the Navy to get insurance as his 26th birthday approached. Instead, he felt he “didn’t make enough to justify having health insurance” and has reluctantly gone without it.

      Ethan Evans, a 27-year-old aspiring actor in Chicago who works in retail, fell off his parents’ plan and temporarily signed up for Medicaid. But the diminished mental health coverage meant cutting back on visits to his longtime therapist.

      Rep. Maxwell Frost, a Florida Democrat and the first Gen Z member of Congress, was able to quit his job and run for office at 25 only because he could stay on his mother’s plan until he turned 26, he said.

      Now 28, he is insured through his federal job.

      “The ACA was groundbreaking legislation, including the idea that every American needs health care,” he said. “But there are pitfalls, and one of them is that when young adults turn 26, they fall into this abyss.”

      Why 26?

      Back in 2010, the decision to make 26 the cutoff age for staying on a parent’s insurance was “kind of arbitrary,” recalled Nancy-Ann DeParle, deputy chief of staff for policy in the Obama White House.

      “My kids were young , and I was trying to imagine when my child would be an adult.”

      Before that time, children were often kicked off family plans at much younger ages, typically 18.

      The Obama administration’s idea was that young adults were most likely settling into careers and jobs with insurance by 26. If they still didn’t have access to job-based insurance, Medicaid and the ACA marketplaces would offer alternatives, the thinking went.

      But over the years, the courts, Congress, and the first Trump administration eviscerated provisions of the ACA. By 2022, a shopper on a federal government-run marketplace had more than 100 choices, many of which included expensive trade-offs, presented in a way that made comparisons difficult without spreadsheets.

      Jack Galanty, 26, a freelance designer in Los Angeles, tried to plan for his 26th birthday by seeking coverage on the California insurance marketplace that would ensure treatment for his mild cerebral palsy and for HIV prevention.

      “You’re scrolling for what feels like years, looking at 450 little slides, at the little bars, and trying to remember, ‘Was the one I liked No. 12 or 13?’” he recalled. “It feels like it’s nearly impossible to make a good choice in this scenario.”

      (Elizabeth Mathis)
      (Kayla Anderson)

      Out-of-pocket expenses have soared. Complex plans in the lightly regulated marketplaces featured rising premiums, high deductibles, and requirements that patients pay a significant portion of the cost of care, often 20% — a charge known as coinsurance.

      More than half of Americans ages 18 to 29 have incurred medical debt in the past five years, a Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News data investigation found. Few have the reserves to pay it off.

      The networks of doctors to choose from in these plans are often so limited that an insured person struggles to get timely appointments. It can even be hard to find the official websites amid an explosion of look-alikes operated by commercial brokers.

      Sharing her contact information with one site that appeared legitimate left Lydia Herne, a social media producer in Brooklyn, “drowning” in texts and phone calls offering plans of uncertain and unregulated quality. “It never ends,” said Herne, 27.

      Young Invincibles, an advocacy group representing young adults, runs its own “navigator” program to help young people choose health insurance plans.

      “We hear the frustration,” said Martha Sanchez, the group’s former director of health policy and advocacy. “Twenty-six-year-olds have had negative experiences in a process that’s become really complex. Many throw up their hands.”

      Elizabeth Mathis, 29, and Evan Pack, 30, a married couple in Salt Lake City, turned to the marketplaces two years ago, after Pack went uninsured for a “really scary” year after he turned 26.

      “Every time he got in the car, I thought, ‘What if?’” Mathis said.

      The couple pays more than $200 a month for a high-deductible health plan backed by a federal subsidy (the kind set to expire next year). It’s a significant expense, but they wanted to be sure they had access to contraception and an antidepressant.

      But last year, Pack suffered serious eye problems and underwent an emergency appendectomy. Their plan left them $9,000 in debt, for medical care billed at over $20,000.

      “Technically, we gambled in the right direction,” Mathis said. “But I don’t feel like we’ve won.”

      The Affordability Problem

      The ACA was supposed to help consumers find affordable, high-quality plans online. The legislation also tried to expand Medicaid programs, which are administered by states, to provide health insurance to low-income Americans.

      But the Supreme Court ruled in 2012 that states could not be forced to expand Medicaid. Ten states, led mostly by Republicans, have not done so, leaving up to 1.5 million Americans, who could have qualified for coverage, .

      Even where Medicaid is available to 26-year-olds, the transition has often proved precarious.

      Madeline Nelkin of New Jersey, who was studying social work, applied for Medicaid coverage before her 26th birthday in April 2024 because her university’s insurance premiums were more than $5,000 annually.

      But it was September before her Medicaid coverage kicked in, leaving her uninsured while she fought a chest infection over the summer.

      “People tell you to think ahead, but I didn’t think that meant six months,” she said.

      (Daisy Creager)
      (Madeline Nelkin)
      (Valeria Chávez)

      When Megan Hughes, 27, of Hartland, Maine, hit the cliff, she went without. An aide for children with developmental delays, she has a thyroid condition and polycystic ovary syndrome.

      She looked for a health care plan but found it hard to understand the marketplace. (She didn’t know there were navigators who could help.) Now she can’t afford her medicine or see her endocrinologist.

      “I’m tired all the time,” Hughes said. “My cycles are not regular anymore at all. When I do get one, it’s debilitating.” She is hoping a new job will provide insurance later this year.

      Traditionally, most Americans with private health insurance got it through their jobs. But the job market has changed dramatically since the ACA became law, particularly in the wake of the pandemic, with the rise of a gig economy.

      Over said in recent surveys that they were working or have worked in short-term, part-time, or irregular jobs.

      The ACA requires organizations with 50 or more employees to offer insurance to people working 30 hours per week. This has led to a growing number of contract employees who work up to, but not past, the hourly limit.

      Many companies, which say they can’t afford the rising costs of traditional insurance, offer their employees only a modicum of help, perhaps around $200 per month toward buying a marketplace plan, or a bare-bones company plan.

      Young people juggling part-time jobs and insurance options face bumpy, daunting transitions.

      In Oklahoma, Daisy Creager, 29, has had three employers over the past three years. Insurance was important to her, not least because her former husband had Type 1 diabetes.

      As she left the first of those jobs, her husband’s endocrinologist helped the couple stockpile less expensive insulin from Canada, since they would be uninsured.

      After a few months, they bought a marketplace plan, but it was expensive and “didn’t cover a lot,” she said.

      When she found a new job, she dropped that plan, only to discover that her new insurance coverage didn’t start until the end of her first month of employment. The couple would be uninsured for a few weeks.

      A few days later, she came home to find her husband unconscious on the floor, in a diabetic coma. After hovering near death in an intensive care unit for four days, he woke up and began to recover.

      “I think I’ve done everything right,” Creager said. “So why am I in a position where the health insurance available to me doesn’t cover what I need, or I can barely afford my premiums, or worse, at times I don’t even have it?”

      Kathryn Russell, 27, developed excruciating back pain two months before her 26th birthday. After extensive testing, doctors determined she needed a complex surgery, which her surgeon couldn’t schedule until after she would be off her family’s insurance plan.

      Forget the pain and the fear of the operation, she said, it was insurance that kept her up at night. “There’s this impending terror of, ‘What am I going to do?’” she recalled.

      (One day before she turned 26, her father’s company agreed to keep her on his plan for six more months, if he paid higher premiums.)

      The idea that the ACA would offer a variety of good options for people turning 26 has not worked as well as the legislation’s authors had hoped. The “job lock” tying insurance to employment has long plagued the United States workforce.

      Young adults need guidance on their options beforehand, said Sanchez of Young Invincibles. None of those interviewed for this story, for example, knew there were navigators to help them find insurance on the online marketplaces.

      Experts agree that the marketplaces need stronger regulation.

      In 2023, for what plans in each tier of insurance should offer, such as better prescription drug benefits, defined copays for X-rays, or coverage for emergency room visits.

      Certain types of basic care, such as primary care, should require just a small copay for at least a small number of initial visits. Each insurer must offer at least one plan that complies with these new standards for every level, known as an “” option or a “standard plan.”

      Most plans on the marketplaces don’t meet these criteria. Federal and state regulators had long planned to cull such “noncompliant” plans, gradually — fearing that doing so too quickly would scare insurers away from participating.

      But with the priorities of the new Trump administration now in focus, and a Republican majority in Congress, it’s far from clear what course President Donald Trump, who sought to repeal the ACA outright in his first term, will take.

      There are hints: Subsidies to help Americans buy insurance, adopted during the Biden administration, are set to expire at the end of 2025 unless the Republican-led Congress extends them.

      If the subsidies expire, for plans sold on the marketplaces, leaving insurance out of reach for many more young adults.

      Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

      This <a target="_blank" href="/health-care-costs/insurance-cliff-age-26-young-adults-chaos/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

      <img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=2066255&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
      2066255
      Watch: How the FDA Opens the Door to Risky Chemicals in America’s Food Supply /courts/fda-risky-chemicals-food-supply-gras-regulation-explainer-video/ Wed, 07 May 2025 09:00:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2029309

      Lining the shelves of American supermarkets are food products with chemicals linked to health concerns. To a great extent, the FDA allows food companies to determine for themselves whether their ingredients and additives are safe.

      Companies don’t have to tell the FDA about those decisions, and they don’t have to list all ingredients on their product labels. Instead, companies can use broad terms such as “artificial flavors.”

      In 1958, Congress mandated that before additives could be used in foods manufacturers had to prove they were safe and get FDA approval. However, Congress carved out an exception for substances “generally recognized as safe,” which came to be known simply as GRAS.

      As conceived, GRAS promised regulatory relief for standard ingredients like salt, sugar, vinegar, and baking powder. Over time, “the loophole swallowed the law,” said a 2014 Natural Resources Defense Council report.

      Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wants to close or tighten the GRAS loophole. He has railed about the risks of food additives for years and has said he wants to end “the mass poisoning of American children.”

      Whether changes come from the FDA or the food companies, it’s clear Americans are becoming more concerned about what they’re buying.

      Credits

      David Hilzenrath Reporter
      Hannah Norman Video producer & animator
      Oona Zenda Art director & illustrator
      Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

      This <a target="_blank" href="/courts/fda-risky-chemicals-food-supply-gras-regulation-explainer-video/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

      <img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=2029309&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
      2029309
      Watch: What Is Medicaid, Again? /health-care-costs/medicaid-health-insurance-explained-video/ Mon, 24 Feb 2025 10:00:00 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=1989792

      Republicans in Congress have suggested big cuts to Medicaid. But what exactly is it?

      Medicaid, the state-federal health insurance program for people with low incomes or disabilities, is integral to the U.S. health care system. It keeps hospitals and other providers afloat, provides a key source of federal funds to states, and helps provide health insurance to people who couldn’t otherwise afford it. More than 79 million people in the U.S. receive services from Medicaid or the closely related Children’s Health Insurance Program. 

      Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News correspondent Sam Whitehead discusses Medicaid’s history and role in the U.S. health system.

      Learn more here:

      Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½Ò•îl Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

      This <a target="_blank" href="/health-care-costs/medicaid-health-insurance-explained-video/">article</a&gt; first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">KFF Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150&quot; style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

      <img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=1989792&amp;ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0&quot; style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>
      1989792