Return To Full Article
You can republish this story for free. Click the "Copy HTML" button below. Questions? Get more details.

Surprise Medical Bills Were Supposed To Be a Thing of the Past. Surprise 鈥 They鈥檙e Not.

Last year in Massachusetts, after finding lumps in her breast, Jessica Chen went to , part of Tufts Medicine, for a mammogram and sonogram. Before the screenings, she asked the hospital for the estimated patient responsibility for the bill using her insurance, Tufts Health Plan. Her portion, she was told, would be $359 鈥 and she paid it. She was more than a little surprised weeks later to receive a bill asking her to pay an additional $1,677.51. 鈥淚 was already trying to stomach $359, and this was many times higher,鈥 Chen, a physician assistant, told me.

The No Surprises Act, which took effect in 2022, was rightly heralded as a landmark piece of legislation, which 鈥減rotects people covered under group and individual health plans from receiving surprise medical bills,鈥 according to the . And yet bills that take patients like Chen by surprise just keep coming.

With the help of her software-wise boyfriend, she found the complicated 鈥渕achine-readable鈥 master price list that hospitals are required to post online and looked up the negotiated rate between Lowell General and her insurer. It was $302.56 鈥 less than she had paid out-of-pocket.

CMS is charged with enforcing the law, so Chen sent a complaint about the surprising bill to the agency. She received a terse email in return: 鈥淲e have reviewed your complaint and have determined that the rights and protections of the No Surprises Act do not apply.鈥

When I asked the health system to explain how such a surprising off-estimate bill could be generated, Tufts Medicine spokesperson responded by email: 鈥淗ealthcare billing is complex and includes various factors and data points, so actual charges for care provided may differ from initial estimates. We understand the frustration these discrepancies can cause.鈥

Here鈥檚 the problem: While the No Surprises Act has been a phenomenal success in taking on some unfair practices in the wild West of medical billing, it was hardly a panacea.

In fact, the measure protected patients primarily from only one particularly egregious type of surprise bill that had become increasingly common before the law鈥檚 enactment: When patients unknowingly got out-of-network care at an in-network facility, or when they had no choice but to get out-of-network care in an emergency. In either case, before President Donald Trump signed the law late in his first term, patients could be hit with tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in out-of-network bills that their insurance wouldn鈥檛 pay.

The No Surprises Act also provided some protection from above-estimate bills, but at the moment, the protection is only , so it wouldn鈥檛 apply in Chen鈥檚 case since she was using health insurance.

But patients who do qualify generally are entitled to an up-front, good-faith estimate for treatment they schedule at least three business days in advance or if they request one. Patients can dispute a bill if it is more than $400 over the estimate. (The No Surprises Act also required what amounted to a good-faith estimate of out-of-pocket costs for patients with insurance, but that provision has not , since, nearly five years later, the government still has not issued rules about exactly what form it should take.)

So, surprising medical bills 鈥 bills that the patient could not have anticipated and never consented to 鈥 are still stunning countless Americans.

Jessica Robbins, who works in product development in Chicago, was certainly surprised when, out of the blue, she was recently billed $3,300 by Endeavor Health for a breast MRI she had received two years earlier, with prior authorization from her then-insurer, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois. In trying to resolve the problem, she found herself caught in a Kafkaesque circle involving dozens of calls and emails. The clinic where she had the procedure no longer existed, having been bought by Endeavor. And she no longer had Blue Cross.

鈥淲e are actively working with the patient and their insurer to resolve this matter,鈥 Endeavor spokesperson Allie Burke said in an emailed response to my questions.

Mary Ann Bonita of Fresno, California, was starting school this year to become a nursing assistant when, on a Friday, she received a positive skin test for tuberculosis. Her school鈥檚 administration said she couldn鈥檛 return to class until she had a negative chest X-ray. When her doctor from Kaiser Permanente didn鈥檛 answer requests to order the test for several days, Bonita went to an emergency room and paid $595 up front for the X-ray, which showed no TB. So she and her husband were surprised to receive another bill, for $1,039, a month later, 鈥渨ith no explanation of what it was for,鈥 said Joel Pickford, Bonita鈥檚 husband.

In the cases above, each patient questioned an expensive, unexpected medical charge that came as a shock 鈥 only to find that the No Surprises Act didn鈥檛 apply.

鈥淭here are many billing problems out there that are surprising but are not technically surprise bills,鈥 Zack Cooper, an associate professor of economics at Yale University, told me. The No Surprises Act fixed a specific kind of charge, he said, 鈥渁nd that鈥檚 great. But, of course, we need to address others.鈥

Cooper鈥檚 research has found that before the No Surprises Act was passed, of emergency room visits yielded a surprise out-of-network bill.

CMS鈥 official No Surprises Help Desk has received tens of thousands of complaints, which it investigates, said Catherine Howden, a CMS spokesperson. 鈥淲hile some billing practices, such as delayed bills, are not currently regulated鈥 by the No Surprises Act, Howden said, complaint trends nonetheless help 鈥渋nform potential areas for future improvements.鈥 And they are needed.

Michelle Rodio, a teacher in Lakewood, Ohio, had a lingering cough weeks after a bout of pneumonia that required treatment with a course of antibiotics. She went to Cleveland Clinic鈥檚 Lakewood Family Health Center for an examination. Her X-ray was fine. As was her nasal swab 鈥 except for the stunning $2,700 bill it generated.

鈥淚 said, 鈥楾his is a surprise bill!鈥欌 Rodio recalled telling the provider鈥檚 finance office. The agent said it was not.

鈥淪o I said, 鈥楴ext time I鈥檒l be sure to ask the doctor for an estimate when I get a nose swab.鈥欌

鈥淭he doctors wouldn鈥檛 know that,鈥 the agent replied, as Rodio recalled 鈥 and indeed physicians generally have no idea how much the tests they order will cost. And in any case, Rodio was not legally entitled to a binding estimate, since the part of the No Surprises Act that grants patients with insurance that right has not been implemented yet.

So she was stuck with a bill of $471 (the patient responsibility portion of the $2,700 charge) that she couldn鈥檛 have consented to (or rejected) in advance. It was surprising 鈥 shocking to her, even 鈥 but not a 鈥渟urprise bill,鈥 according to the current law. But shouldn鈥檛 it be?

杨贵妃传媒視頻 Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF鈥攁n independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

Help 杨贵妃传媒視頻 Health News track this article

By including these elements when you republish, you help us:
  • Understand which communities and people we鈥檙e reaching.
  • Measure the impact of our health journalism.
  • Continue providing free, high-quality health news to the public.
Canonical Tag

Include this in your page's <head> section to properly attribute this content.

Tracking Snippet

Add this snippet at the end of your republished article to help us track its reach.