Return To Full Article
You can republish this story for free. Click the "Copy HTML" button below. Questions? Get more details.

Trump鈥檚 Wrong. 15% 鈥楬erd Immunity鈥 Is Not on Par With Strength of a Vaccine

The percentage of Americans with natural immunity from getting COVID-19 is 鈥渁 very powerful vaccine in itself.鈥

鈥 President Donald Trump on Dec. 8 at a White House Operation Warp Speed vaccine summit

Politifact Rating

During a Dec. 8 , President Donald Trump likened the spread of the coronavirus throughout the population 鈥 which experts agree bestows some immunity on the people who became ill 鈥 to having a COVID-19 vaccine.

鈥淵ou develop immunity over a period of time, and I hear we鈥檙e close to 15%. I鈥檓 hearing that, and that is terrific. That鈥檚 a very powerful vaccine in itself,鈥 said Trump, who was responding to a reporter鈥檚 question about what his message to the American people was as the holidays approach and levels of COVID cases in the U.S. continue to rise.

It wasn鈥檛 the first time Trump had given credence to the idea that if enough people in a population gain immunity to a disease by being exposed to it, the illness won鈥檛 be able to spread through the remainder of the population 鈥 a concept known as 鈥herd immunity.

However, experts have warned that attempting to achieve herd immunity naturally, by allowing people to get sick with COVID-19, could result in more than a million deaths and potentially long-term health problems for many. A better way to achieve protection across the population, experts say, is through widespread vaccination.

So, we thought it was important to check whether 15% is anywhere close to the herd immunity threshold, and whether this level of natural immunity could be considered 鈥渁s powerful as a vaccine.鈥

15% Is Nowhere Close

The White House did not respond to our request for more information about the comment or about Trump鈥檚 15% figure.

It may be derived from a using mathematical models to estimate that 53 million Americans 鈥 about 16% of the population 鈥 have likely been infected with COVID-19. Those models took into consideration the nation鈥檚 number of confirmed cases, and then used existing data to calculate estimates of the number of people who had COVID-19 but didn鈥檛 seek medical attention, weren鈥檛 able to access a COVID-19 test, received a false-negative test result or were asymptomatic and unaware they had COVID-19.

It鈥檚 important to note this estimate is based on data from February through September 鈥 and it's now mid-December, so the share of Americans who have been infected with the coronavirus would likely be much higher. For instance, an independent data scientist, Youyang Gu, estimated that 17.5% of Americans have had COVID-19 as of Nov. 30. His estimate is published on his website, .

Experts have said that a 15% infection rate among Americans is nowhere close to the threshold needed to reach herd immunity against COVID.

鈥淭o get to herd immunity, an estimated 60-80% of people need to have immunity (either through natural infection or through the vaccine),鈥 , an emergency physician and visiting professor at George Washington University, wrote in an email. 鈥淲e are a very long way off from that.鈥

Also, Wen said, scientists still don鈥檛 know enough about how effective natural immunity is in defending against COVID-19. It appears that once someone has had COVID-19 and recovered, the antibodies their body produced can protect them for at least several months. But, there have also been of COVID-19 re-infection.

That鈥檚 why medical experts , whether they have had COVID-19 or not.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, recently set the saturation level for herd immunity even higher 鈥 鈥 in an interview with Axios.

At that point, he said, 鈥測ou create an 鈥 that even though there is virus around, it is really almost inconsequential because it has no place to go, because almost all of the people are protected."

Both the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines have shown at protecting people from developing COVID-19 in clinical trials. The Food and Drug Administration on Friday Pfizer鈥檚 vaccine for emergency use. This Thursday, an independent panel will consider whether to recommend that the FDA authorize the emergency use of Moderna鈥檚 COVID-19 vaccine.

So, that leads to the next question: Is 15% natural immunity among the American population anywhere close to a 鈥減owerful vaccine,鈥 as Trump alleges?

No, said the experts. And there鈥檚 nothing 鈥渢errific鈥 about that level of infection within the community.

鈥淔ifteen percent 鈥榥atural immunity鈥 is nowhere close to as powerful as a vaccine,鈥 , director of the Arnhold Institute for Global Health at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, wrote in an email.

Assuming that natural immunity is effective, reaching a level of 15% of the population would prevent only those individuals who have had COVID from getting sick again, said , an epidemiology professor at Columbia University.

鈥淏ut [it] won鈥檛 do much to prevent virus spread in the community, because there are still so many susceptible people,鈥 Morse wrote in an email. Plus, 15% of the American population having had COVID-19 鈥渉as come at a high cost,鈥 Morse wrote. To achieve 15% natural immunity, more than 300,000 people in the U.S. have been sacrificed.

Our Ruling

Though Trump was in the ballpark when he referenced the share of Americans who have been infected with the coronavirus, his overall point 鈥 that the natural immunity these people acquired is a powerful vaccine 鈥 does not hold up. Experts repeatedly have warned that not enough is known about the immunity people appear to gain after recovering from a COVID-19 infection to know how effective or lasting it is. And there have been reported cases of COVID re-infections.

Also, experts agree more than 70% of the U.S. population needs to be vaccinated in order to reach herd immunity. Fifteen percent is nowhere close to that threshold and should not be considered as effective as a COVID-19 vaccine. Moreover, that 15% statistic brought with it hundreds of thousands of deaths.

We rate this claim False.

Sources

ABC News, Sept. 15, 2020.

Axios, Dec. 10, 2020.

Business Insider, Dec. 9, 2020.

Clinical Infectious Disease, Aug. 25, 2020.

Clinical Infectious Disease, Nov. 25, 2020.

Email interview with , visiting professor of health policy and management at George Washington University, Dec. 10, 2020.

Email interview with , director of the Arnhold Global Health Institute at Mount Sinai, Dec. 10, 2020.

Email interview with , an epidemiology professor at Columbia University Medical Center, Dec. 10, 2020.

Internet archives, , 2020, accessed Dec. 12, 2020.

KHN, 鈥淐orralling the Facts on Herd Immunity,鈥 Sept. 29, 2020.

KHN, 鈥Morning Briefing 鈥 In Letter, Scores of Scientists Strongly Denounce Herd Immunity,鈥 Oct. 15, 2020.

NBC News, Dec. 11, 2020.

NPR, Nov. 30, 2020.

PBS, Nov. 18, 2020.

Phone interview with , adjunct professor of global health at George Washington University, Dec. 11, 2020.

Phone interview with , associate director of global health policy at KFF, Dec. 10, 2020.

PolitiFact, April 21, 2020.

The Wall Street Journal, Nov. 27, 2020.

The Washington Post, Dec. 8, 2020.

The Washington Post, Oct. 29, 2020.

The White House, , Aug. 11, 2020.

The White House, Dec. 8, 2020.

杨贵妃传媒視頻 Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF鈥攁n independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

Help 杨贵妃传媒視頻 Health News track this article

By including these elements when you republish, you help us:
  • Understand which communities and people we鈥檙e reaching.
  • Measure the impact of our health journalism.
  • Continue providing free, high-quality health news to the public.
Canonical Tag

Include this in your page's <head> section to properly attribute this content.

Tracking Snippet

Add this snippet at the end of your republished article to help us track its reach.